PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTGD vs. GDXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BTGD vs. GDXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BTGD vs. GDXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
-20.27%34.62%29.81%
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
0.12%88.08%-14.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -20.27% return, which is significantly lower than GDXY's 0.12% return.


BTGD

1D
5.80%
1M
-9.91%
YTD
-20.27%
6M
-34.23%
1Y
5.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDXY

1D
4.88%
1M
-19.63%
YTD
0.12%
6M
7.38%
1Y
48.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BTGD vs. GDXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTGD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BTGD vs. GDXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTGD
BTGD Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BTGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTGD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BTGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTGD Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXY
GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTGD vs. GDXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTGDGDXYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.10

1.32

-1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.54

1.63

-1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.25

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

1.76

-1.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.27

6.60

-6.33

BTGD vs. GDXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTGD Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the GDXY Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTGD and GDXY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTGDGDXYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

1.32

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.02

-0.57

Correlation

The correlation between BTGD and GDXY is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BTGD vs. GDXY - Dividend Comparison

BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than GDXY's 61.55% yield.


TTM20252024
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
4.22%3.36%0.19%
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
61.55%52.13%23.91%

Drawdowns

BTGD vs. GDXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than GDXY's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and GDXY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BTGDGDXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-28.03%

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.14%

-28.03%

-17.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.60%

-19.63%

-21.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.98%

-5.16%

-6.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.83%

7.48%

+11.35%

Volatility

BTGD vs. GDXY - Volatility Comparison

STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a higher volatility of 19.19% compared to YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) at 16.12%. This indicates that BTGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BTGDGDXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.19%

16.12%

+3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.05%

31.43%

+16.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.78%

36.74%

+20.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.74%

31.11%

+25.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.74%

31.11%

+25.63%