BTGD vs. GDXY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) and GDXY (YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTGD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Quantify Funds, while GDXY is a Derivative Income fund managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, BTGD returned -30.17% vs 30.32% for GDXY. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTGD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GDXY.

Performance

BTGD vs. GDXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -28.65% return, which is significantly lower than GDXY's -6.82% return.

BTGD

• 1D: -4.01%
• 1M: -20.36%
• YTD: -28.65%
• 6M: -31.64%
• 1Y: -30.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDXY

• 1D: -2.47%
• 1M: -2.37%
• YTD: -6.82%
• 6M: -3.09%
• 1Y: 30.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTGD vs. GDXY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF	-28.65%	34.62%	29.81%
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF	-6.82%	88.08%	-14.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BTGD and GDXY is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024	0.46

The correlation between BTGD and GDXY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTGD vs. GDXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTGD

BTGD Risk / Return Rank: 4
BTGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BTGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BTGD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BTGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTGD Martin Ratio Rank: 3

GDXY

GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 23
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 25
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTGD vs. GDXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTGD	GDXY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	0.83	-1.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	1.18	-1.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.17	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.63	1.09	-1.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	2.77	-4.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTGD vs. GDXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the GDXY Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTGD and GDXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTGD	GDXY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55	0.83	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.76	-0.50

Drawdowns

BTGD vs. GDXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, which is greater than GDXY's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and GDXY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTGD	GDXY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.73%	-28.03%	-19.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.73%	-28.03%	-19.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.73%	-25.20%	-22.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.58%	-6.40%	-8.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.09%	10.96%	+13.13%

Volatility

BTGD vs. GDXY - Volatility Comparison

STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) have volatilities of 11.95% and 11.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTGD	GDXY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.95%	11.75%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.64%	30.92%	+14.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.04%	36.57%	+18.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.51%	31.73%	+23.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.51%	31.73%	+23.78%

BTGD vs. GDXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTGD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTGD vs. GDXY - Dividend Comparison

BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than GDXY's 74.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF	4.71%	3.36%	0.19%
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF	74.25%	52.13%	23.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTGD and GDXY in my portfolio?

BTGD and GDXY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTGD or GDXY?

BTGD has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to GDXY (11.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -47.73% vs GDXY's -28.03%.

Which ETF is better, BTGD or GDXY?

On 1-year performance, GDXY leads with 30.32% vs -30.17% for BTGD. On fees, GDXY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, GDXY has been the lower-risk option at 11.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTGD or GDXY?

Over the 1-year period, GDXY has performed better with a 30.32% return vs -30.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTGD or GDXY?

GDXY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTGD or GDXY?

GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 74.25%, compared with 4.71% for BTGD.

What is the main difference between BTGD and GDXY?

BTGD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GDXY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTGD and 0.99% for GDXY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDXY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.