BTGD vs. GLD
BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - BTGD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Quantify Funds, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. BTGD is actively managed, while GLD is passively managed. Over the past year, BTGD returned -38.26% vs 21.29% for GLD. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTGD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
BTGD vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -38.68% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's -4.79% return.
BTGD
- 1D
- -4.97%
- 1M
- -27.36%
- YTD
- -38.68%
- 6M
- -41.46%
- 1Y
- -38.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- -4.79%
- 6M
- -8.78%
- 1Y
- 21.29%
- 3Y*
- 28.41%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
BTGD vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | -38.68% | 34.62% | 29.32% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -4.79% | 63.68% | -1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTGD and GLD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between BTGD and GLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTGD vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
BTGD
GLD
BTGD vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTGD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.17 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 0.87 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 2.35 | -3.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTGD vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTGD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.08% | -45.56% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.08% | -24.46% | -30.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.08% | -23.91% | -31.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.71% | -16.17% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.82% | 9.10% | +17.72% |
Volatility
BTGD vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a higher volatility of 18.30% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 8.18%. This indicates that BTGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTGD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.30% | 8.18% | +10.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.64% | 24.38% | +23.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.04% | 27.57% | +29.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.14% | 18.24% | +37.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.14% | 16.04% | +40.10% |
BTGD vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTGD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTGD vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | 5.48% | 3.36% | 0.19% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTGD and GLD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTGD has higher volatility (18.30%) compared to GLD (8.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -55.08% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 1-year performance, GLD leads with 21.29% vs -38.26% for BTGD. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GLD has performed better with a 21.29% return vs -38.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.
BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
BTGD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GLD is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTGD and 0.40% for GLD.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTGD and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer