BTGD vs. GLD
BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - BTGD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Quantify Funds, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. BTGD is actively managed, while GLD is passively managed. Over the past year, BTGD returned -30.17% vs 32.04% for GLD. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTGD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
BTGD vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -28.65% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 2.92% return.
BTGD
- 1D
- -4.01%
- 1M
- -20.36%
- YTD
- -28.65%
- 6M
- -31.64%
- 1Y
- -30.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
BTGD vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | -28.65% | 34.62% | 29.81% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | -2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTGD and GLD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between BTGD and GLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTGD vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
BTGD
GLD
BTGD vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTGD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | 1.21 | -1.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | 1.60 | -2.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.24 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 1.68 | -2.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 4.15 | -5.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTGD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 1.21 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.60 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
BTGD vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, roughly equal to the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTGD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.73% | -45.56% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.73% | -19.21% | -28.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.73% | -17.75% | -29.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.58% | -16.16% | +1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.09% | 7.73% | +16.36% |
Volatility
BTGD vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a higher volatility of 11.95% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.51%. This indicates that BTGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTGD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.95% | 5.51% | +6.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.64% | 23.16% | +22.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.04% | 26.61% | +28.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.51% | 18.00% | +37.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.51% | 15.95% | +39.56% |
BTGD vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTGD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTGD vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | 4.71% | 3.36% | 0.19% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTGD and GLD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTGD has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -47.73% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 1-year performance, GLD leads with 32.04% vs -30.17% for BTGD. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GLD has performed better with a 32.04% return vs -30.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.
BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
BTGD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GLD is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTGD and 0.40% for GLD.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTGD and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer