PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCX vs. FLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCX vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 1.91% return.


BSCX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.21%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLTR

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.91%
6M
2.40%
1Y
5.30%
3Y*
6.10%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
3.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCX vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSCX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF
0.17%9.31%1.73%7.88%
FLTR
VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
1.91%5.22%7.38%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCX and FLTR is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCX vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCX
BSCX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FLTR
FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCX vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCXFLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-10.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

3.15

-1.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

16.96

-14.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.83

101.23

-94.40

BSCX vs. FLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the FLTR Sharpe Ratio of 6.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCX and FLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCXFLTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

6.77

-5.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.53

+0.64

Drawdowns

BSCX vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCX drawdown since its inception was -5.13%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCX and FLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCXFLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-17.84%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.90%

-0.31%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-0.04%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-0.67%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.05%

+0.84%

Volatility

BSCX vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.25%. This indicates that BSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCXFLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

0.25%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

0.62%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

0.79%

+3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

2.13%

+3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.08%

5.00%

+1.08%

BSCX vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCX vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

BSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than FLTR's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF
4.89%4.82%5.00%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLTR
VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
4.73%4.97%5.93%6.07%2.29%0.63%1.49%3.05%2.67%1.69%1.16%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCX and FLTR have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSCX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to FLTR (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCX dropped -5.13% vs FLTR's -17.84%.

On 1-year performance, BSCX leads with 6.09% vs 5.30% for FLTR. On fees, BSCX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BSCX has performed better with a 6.09% return vs 5.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for FLTR.

BSCX has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 4.73% for FLTR.

BSCX tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2033 Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCX and 0.14% for FLTR.

FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.77 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCX and FLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer