BSCX vs. ICLO
BSCX (Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF) and ICLO (Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCX is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2033 Index, while ICLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Invesco. BSCX is passively managed, while ICLO is actively managed. Over the past year, BSCX returned 6.45% vs 5.58% for ICLO. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for ICLO.
Performance
BSCX vs. ICLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than ICLO's 2.07% return.
BSCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICLO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCX vs. ICLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCX Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.36% | 9.31% | 1.73% | 7.88% |
ICLO Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF | 2.07% | 5.27% | 7.05% | 2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCX and ICLO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023 | 0.10 |
BSCX vs. ICLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCX
ICLO
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
BSCX
ICLO
-
Technology
BSCX
ICLO
-
Financial Services
BSCX
ICLO
Communication Services
BSCX
ICLO
-
Energy
BSCX
ICLO
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSCX
ICLO
Industrials
BSCX
ICLO
-
Consumer Defensive
BSCX
ICLO
-
Utilities
BSCX
ICLO
-
Real Estate
BSCX
ICLO
-
Basic Materials
BSCX
ICLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCX vs. ICLO — Risk / Return Rank
BSCX
ICLO
BSCX vs. ICLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) and Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCX | ICLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 4.10 | -2.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 6.95 | -4.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.98 | -0.70 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 16.01 | -13.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 69.05 | -61.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCX | ICLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 4.10 | -2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 2.83 | -1.65 |
Drawdowns
BSCX vs. ICLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCX drawdown since its inception was -5.13%, which is greater than ICLO's maximum drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCX and ICLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCX | ICLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -3.47% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.90% | -0.35% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -0.02% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -0.06% | -1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 0.08% | +0.81% |
Volatility
BSCX vs. ICLO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF (ICLO) at 0.32%. This indicates that BSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCX | ICLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 0.32% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 0.78% | +2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11% | 1.37% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 2.43% | +3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 2.43% | +3.66% |
BSCX vs. ICLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ICLO's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCX vs. ICLO - Dividend Comparison
BSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than ICLO's 5.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCX Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.88% | 4.82% | 5.00% | 1.08% |
ICLO Invesco Aaa CLO Floating Rate Note ETF | 5.12% | 5.49% | 6.51% | 7.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCX and ICLO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSCX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to ICLO (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCX dropped -5.13% vs ICLO's -3.47%.
On 1-year performance, BSCX leads with 6.45% vs 5.58% for ICLO. On fees, BSCX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, ICLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BSCX has performed better with a 6.45% return vs 5.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for ICLO.
ICLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 4.88% for BSCX.
BSCX is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ICLO is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCX and 0.26% for ICLO.
ICLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.10 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCX and ICLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer