BSCX vs. OVT
BSCX (Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF) and OVT (Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. BSCX is passively managed, while OVT is actively managed. Over the past year, BSCX returned 6.45% vs 9.16% for OVT. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSCX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for OVT.
Performance
BSCX vs. OVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than OVT's 2.77% return.
BSCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OVT
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 2.77%
- 6M
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 9.16%
- 3Y*
- 7.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCX vs. OVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCX Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.36% | 9.31% | 1.73% | 7.88% |
OVT Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF | 2.77% | 7.61% | 7.44% | 4.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCX and OVT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023 | 0.59 |
The correlation between BSCX and OVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSCX vs. OVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCX
OVT
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Healthcare
BSCX
OVT
Technology
BSCX
OVT
Financial Services
BSCX
OVT
Communication Services
BSCX
OVT
Energy
BSCX
OVT
Consumer Cyclical
BSCX
OVT
Industrials
BSCX
OVT
Consumer Defensive
BSCX
OVT
Utilities
BSCX
OVT
Real Estate
BSCX
OVT
Basic Materials
BSCX
OVT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCX vs. OVT — Risk / Return Rank
BSCX
OVT
BSCX vs. OVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCX | OVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 2.68 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 3.94 | -1.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.53 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 5.88 | -3.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 20.45 | -13.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCX | OVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.68 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.69 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
BSCX vs. OVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCX drawdown since its inception was -5.13%, smaller than the maximum OVT drawdown of -13.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCX and OVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCX | OVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -13.59% | +8.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.90% | -1.55% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -0.25% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -3.39% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 0.45% | +0.44% |
Volatility
BSCX vs. OVT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) at 0.88%. This indicates that BSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCX | OVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 0.88% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 2.53% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11% | 3.44% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 4.63% | +1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 4.54% | +1.55% |
BSCX vs. OVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than OVT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCX vs. OVT - Dividend Comparison
BSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than OVT's 8.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCX Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.88% | 4.82% | 5.00% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OVT Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF | 8.16% | 7.21% | 6.15% | 5.11% | 4.12% | 4.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCX and OVT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSCX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to OVT (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCX dropped -5.13% vs OVT's -13.59%.
On 1-year performance, OVT leads with 9.16% vs 6.45% for BSCX. On fees, BSCX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, OVT has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OVT has performed better with a 9.16% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVT.
OVT has the higher dividend yield at 8.16%, compared with 4.88% for BSCX.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCX and 0.80% for OVT.
OVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCX and OVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer