BSAC vs. SQM
BSAC (Banco Santander-Chile) and SQM (Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.) are both stocks. BSAC operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while SQM operates in Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, BSAC returned 11.25%/yr vs 17.10%/yr for SQM. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BSAC vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSAC achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly lower than SQM's 15.62% return. Over the past 10 years, BSAC has underperformed SQM with an annualized return of 11.25%, while SQM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.10% annualized return.
BSAC
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 10.94%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 44.96%
- 3Y*
- 27.56%
- 5Y*
- 15.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
SQM
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 15.62%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- 1Y
- 148.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- 17.10%
BSAC vs. SQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 10.94% | 74.42% | 1.00% | 31.92% | 2.99% | -11.02% | -13.01% | -19.87% | -0.13% | 48.06% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 15.62% | 89.55% | -39.35% | -18.47% | 71.62% | 6.82% | 89.19% | -27.30% | -32.71% | 115.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSAC and SQM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1994 | 0.39 |
Fundamentals
BSAC:
CLP 2.88K
SQM:
$2.86
BSAC:
10.32
SQM:
27.48
BSAC:
0.97
SQM:
0.16
BSAC:
2.18
SQM:
4.23
BSAC:
CLP 4.82T
SQM:
$5.31B
BSAC:
CLP 2.99T
SQM:
$1.83B
BSAC:
CLP 1.38T
SQM:
$1.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSAC vs. SQM — Risk / Return Rank
BSAC
SQM
BSAC vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSAC | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 6.46 | -4.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.90 | 17.74 | -11.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSAC vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSAC drawdown since its inception was -63.90%, smaller than the maximum SQM drawdown of -78.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSAC and SQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSAC | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.90% | -78.34% | +14.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.42% | -23.11% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.67% | -61.32% | +40.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.02% | -69.76% | +32.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.90% | -72.98% | +9.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.86% | -19.77% | +11.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.31% | -30.31% | +11.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | 8.40% | -0.76% |
Volatility
BSAC vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) is 9.27%, while Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) has a volatility of 14.57%. This indicates that BSAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSAC | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.27% | 14.57% | -5.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.45% | 36.39% | -11.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.69% | 51.39% | -22.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.50% | 49.84% | -20.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.93% | 46.15% | -15.22% |
Dividends
BSAC vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
BSAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than SQM's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 4.62% | 4.34% | 4.10% | 6.54% | 7.70% | 5.70% | 4.64% | 4.91% | 4.97% | 2.73% | 3.94% | 5.12% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 1.47% | 0.18% | 0.59% | 8.34% | 9.66% | 3.92% | 1.64% | 4.55% | 5.37% | 2.73% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
Financials
BSAC vs. SQM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco Santander-Chile and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BSAC vs. SQM - Profitability Comparison
BSAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Santander-Chile reported a gross profit of 733.43B and revenue of 733.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
SQM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a gross profit of 778.60M and revenue of 1.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.
BSAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Santander-Chile reported an operating income of 336.39B and revenue of 733.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.
SQM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported an operating income of 729.70M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.
BSAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Santander-Chile reported a net income of 273.19B and revenue of 733.43B, resulting in a net margin of 37.3%.
SQM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a net income of 364.70M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BSAC and SQM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQM has higher volatility (14.57%) compared to BSAC (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSAC dropped -63.90% vs SQM's -78.34%.
SQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSAC and SQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer