SQM vs. NTR

In the year-to-date period, SQM achieves a -1.54% return, which is significantly lower than NTR's 22.11% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SQM Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the NTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQM and NTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than NTR's 4.01% yield.

The maximum SQM drawdown since its inception was -78.66%, which is greater than NTR's maximum drawdown of -58.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQM and NTR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) has a higher volatility of 20.50% compared to Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) at 10.67%. This indicates that SQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. and Nutrien Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.