PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQM vs. LTHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SQM vs. LTHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and Livent Corporation (LTHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SQM

1D
-1.31%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
15.62%
6M
13.48%
1Y
148.39%
3Y*
5.90%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
17.10%

LTHM

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQM vs. LTHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
15.62%89.55%-39.35%-18.47%71.62%6.82%89.19%-27.30%-9.96%
LTHM
Livent Corporation
0.00%0.00%-8.18%-9.51%-18.50%29.41%120.35%-38.04%-15.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SQM and LTHM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2018

0.51

The correlation between SQM and LTHM shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

SQM:

$5.31B

LTHM:

$920.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SQM:

$1.83B

LTHM:

$539.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

SQM:

$1.75B

LTHM:

$491.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQM vs. LTHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQM
SQM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

LTHM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQM vs. LTHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and Livent Corporation (LTHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SQMLTHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.74

SQM vs. LTHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SQM vs. LTHM - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQMLTHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.40%

Volatility

SQM vs. LTHM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQMLTHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.15%

Dividends

SQM vs. LTHM - Dividend Comparison

SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while LTHM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTHM
Livent Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
1.47%0.18%0.59%8.34%9.66%3.92%1.64%4.55%5.37%2.73%4.77%2.00%

Financials

SQM vs. LTHM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. and Livent Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
1.76B
211.40M
(SQM) Total Revenue
(LTHM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SQM and LTHM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQM and LTHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer