PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSAC vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSAC vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSAC achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 28.31% return. Over the past 10 years, BSAC has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 11.25%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 25.75% annualized return.


BSAC

1D
0.74%
1M
6.13%
YTD
10.94%
6M
10.45%
1Y
44.96%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
15.63%
10Y*
11.25%

FTEC

1D
0.40%
1M
4.21%
YTD
28.31%
6M
27.06%
1Y
54.89%
3Y*
32.23%
5Y*
20.85%
10Y*
25.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSAC vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSAC
Banco Santander-Chile
10.94%74.42%1.00%31.92%2.99%-11.02%-13.01%-19.87%-0.13%48.06%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
28.31%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BSAC and FTEC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSAC vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSAC
BSAC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BSAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BSAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSAC vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSACFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.39

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

10.46

-4.56

BSAC vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSAC and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSAC vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSAC drawdown since its inception was -63.90%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSAC and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSACFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.90%

-34.95%

-28.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.42%

-16.26%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.67%

-27.30%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.02%

-34.95%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.90%

-34.95%

-28.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.86%

-4.17%

-3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.31%

-5.57%

-13.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.64%

5.26%

+2.38%

Volatility

BSAC vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) is 9.27%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that BSAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSACFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.27%

10.69%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.45%

18.25%

+6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.69%

22.50%

+6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.50%

25.54%

+3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.93%

24.87%

+6.06%

Dividends

BSAC vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

BSAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than FTEC's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSAC
Banco Santander-Chile
4.62%4.34%4.10%6.54%7.70%5.70%4.64%4.91%4.97%2.73%3.94%5.12%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.35%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSAC and FTEC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTEC has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to BSAC (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSAC dropped -63.90% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSAC and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer