PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSAC vs. ENIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BSAC vs. ENIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) and Enel Chile S.A. (ENIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSAC achieves a 16.78% return, which is significantly higher than ENIC's 15.46% return. Over the past 10 years, BSAC has outperformed ENIC with an annualized return of 10.53%, while ENIC has yielded a comparatively lower 3.28% annualized return.


BSAC

1D
-1.31%
1M
5.97%
6M
3.15%
YTD
16.78%
1Y
57.07%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
10.53%
ALL TIME*
9.13%

ENIC

1D
-2.42%
1M
0.68%
6M
5.98%
YTD
15.46%
1Y
45.96%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
18.66%
10Y*
3.28%
ALL TIME*
1.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.37M$10.64M$12.51M
$2.48M$2.37M$2.61M

BSAC vs. ENIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSAC
Banco Santander-Chile
16.78%74.42%1.00%31.92%2.99%-11.02%-13.01%-19.87%-0.13%48.06%
ENIC
Enel Chile S.A.
15.46%48.47%-3.58%62.00%26.20%-49.96%-12.51%0.87%-9.09%28.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BSAC and ENIC is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2016

0.48

The correlation between BSAC and ENIC shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BSAC:

$16.31B

ENIC:

$6.14B

EPS

BSAC:

CLP 2.39K

ENIC:

$0.41

PE Ratio

BSAC:

13.45

ENIC:

10.91

PEG Ratio

BSAC:

1.03

ENIC:

0.00

PS Ratio

BSAC:

3.12

ENIC:

1.41

PB Ratio

BSAC:

3.05

ENIC:

1.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

BSAC:

CLP 4.85T

ENIC:

$4.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BSAC:

CLP 3.06T

ENIC:

$1.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

BSAC:

CLP 1.51T

ENIC:

$1.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSAC vs. ENIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSAC
BSAC Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BSAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSAC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BSAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSAC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ENIC
ENIC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ENIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENIC Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ENIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENIC Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSAC vs. ENIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) and Enel Chile S.A. (ENIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSACENICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.01

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.59

9.02

-1.43

BSAC vs. ENIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the ENIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSAC and ENIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSAC vs. ENIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSAC drawdown since its inception was -63.90%, smaller than the maximum ENIC drawdown of -79.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSAC and ENIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSACENICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.90%

-79.74%

+15.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.42%

-15.33%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.42%

-22.50%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.02%

-60.01%

+22.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.90%

-79.74%

+15.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-4.72%

+1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.27%

-29.09%

+9.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.65%

5.11%

+2.54%

Volatility

BSAC vs. ENIC - Volatility Comparison

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) and Enel Chile S.A. (ENIC) have volatilities of 7.20% and 7.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSACENICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

7.05%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.23%

22.69%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.01%

28.09%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.33%

38.03%

-8.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.92%

35.80%

-4.88%

Dividends

BSAC vs. ENIC - Dividend Comparison

BSAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, which matches ENIC's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSAC
Banco Santander-Chile
4.39%4.34%4.10%6.54%7.70%5.70%4.64%4.91%4.97%2.73%3.94%5.12%
ENIC
Enel Chile S.A.
4.39%5.56%8.55%10.38%1.00%12.08%6.54%4.88%4.97%2.76%2.46%0.00%

Financials

BSAC vs. ENIC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco Santander-Chile and Enel Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BSAC vs. ENIC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Banco Santander-Chile and Enel Chile S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BSAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Banco Santander-Chile reported a gross profit of 705.96B and revenue of 1.23T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.

ENIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enel Chile S.A. reported a gross profit of 356.99M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.2%.

BSAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Banco Santander-Chile reported an operating income of 450.97B and revenue of 1.23T, resulting in an operating margin of 36.8%.

ENIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enel Chile S.A. reported an operating income of 162.17M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

BSAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Banco Santander-Chile reported a net income of 382.57B and revenue of 1.23T, resulting in a net margin of 31.2%.

ENIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enel Chile S.A. reported a net income of 109.56M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BSAC and ENIC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSAC has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to ENIC (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSAC dropped -63.90% vs ENIC's -79.74%.

BSAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSAC and ENIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer