BSAC vs. ENIC
BSAC (Banco Santander-Chile) and ENIC (Enel Chile S.A.) are both stocks. BSAC operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while ENIC operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, BSAC returned 11.25%/yr vs 3.73%/yr for ENIC. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BSAC vs. ENIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSAC achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly lower than ENIC's 18.58% return. Over the past 10 years, BSAC has outperformed ENIC with an annualized return of 11.25%, while ENIC has yielded a comparatively lower 3.73% annualized return.
BSAC
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 10.94%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 44.96%
- 3Y*
- 27.56%
- 5Y*
- 15.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
ENIC
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 8.06%
- YTD
- 18.58%
- 6M
- 20.68%
- 1Y
- 35.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.09%
- 5Y*
- 16.64%
- 10Y*
- 3.73%
BSAC vs. ENIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 10.94% | 74.42% | 1.00% | 31.92% | 2.99% | -11.02% | -13.01% | -19.87% | -0.13% | 48.06% |
ENIC Enel Chile S.A. | 18.58% | 48.47% | -3.58% | 62.00% | 26.20% | -49.96% | -12.51% | 0.87% | -9.09% | 28.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSAC and ENIC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2016 | 0.47 |
The correlation between BSAC and ENIC shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BSAC:
CLP 2.88K
ENIC:
$0.44
BSAC:
10.32
ENIC:
10.45
BSAC:
0.97
ENIC:
0.00
BSAC:
2.18
ENIC:
1.36
BSAC:
CLP 4.82T
ENIC:
$3.49B
BSAC:
CLP 2.99T
ENIC:
$1.28B
BSAC:
CLP 1.38T
ENIC:
$1.19B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSAC vs. ENIC — Risk / Return Rank
BSAC
ENIC
BSAC vs. ENIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) and Enel Chile S.A. (ENIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSAC | ENIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.32 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.90 | 6.02 | -0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSAC vs. ENIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSAC drawdown since its inception was -63.90%, smaller than the maximum ENIC drawdown of -79.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSAC and ENIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSAC | ENIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.90% | -79.74% | +15.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.42% | -15.33% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.67% | -27.84% | +7.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.02% | -64.21% | +27.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.90% | -79.74% | +15.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.86% | -2.15% | -5.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.31% | -29.35% | +10.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | 5.90% | +1.74% |
Volatility
BSAC vs. ENIC - Volatility Comparison
Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to Enel Chile S.A. (ENIC) at 7.57%. This indicates that BSAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSAC | ENIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.27% | 7.57% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.45% | 22.27% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.69% | 27.79% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.50% | 38.18% | -8.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.93% | 35.79% | -4.86% |
Dividends
BSAC vs. ENIC - Dividend Comparison
BSAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than ENIC's 4.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 4.62% | 4.34% | 4.10% | 6.54% | 7.70% | 5.70% | 4.64% | 4.91% | 4.97% | 2.73% | 3.94% | 5.12% |
ENIC Enel Chile S.A. | 4.27% | 5.56% | 8.55% | 10.38% | 1.00% | 12.08% | 6.54% | 4.88% | 4.97% | 2.76% | 2.46% | 0.00% |
Financials
BSAC vs. ENIC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco Santander-Chile and Enel Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BSAC vs. ENIC - Profitability Comparison
BSAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Santander-Chile reported a gross profit of 733.43B and revenue of 733.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
ENIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enel Chile S.A. reported a gross profit of 526.00M and revenue of 1.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.9%.
BSAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Santander-Chile reported an operating income of 336.39B and revenue of 733.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.
ENIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enel Chile S.A. reported an operating income of 326.00M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.2%.
BSAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Santander-Chile reported a net income of 273.19B and revenue of 733.43B, resulting in a net margin of 37.3%.
ENIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enel Chile S.A. reported a net income of 162.00M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BSAC and ENIC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSAC has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to ENIC (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSAC dropped -63.90% vs ENIC's -79.74%.
BSAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSAC and ENIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer