PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSAC vs. BCH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BSAC vs. BCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) and Banco de Chile (BCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSAC achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly lower than BCH's 11.91% return. Over the past 10 years, BSAC has underperformed BCH with an annualized return of 11.25%, while BCH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.83% annualized return.


BSAC

1D
0.74%
1M
6.13%
YTD
10.94%
6M
10.45%
1Y
44.96%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
15.63%
10Y*
11.25%

BCH

1D
-0.32%
1M
6.74%
YTD
11.91%
6M
11.35%
1Y
44.84%
3Y*
34.90%
5Y*
23.68%
10Y*
13.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSAC vs. BCH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSAC
Banco Santander-Chile
10.94%74.42%1.00%31.92%2.99%-11.02%-13.01%-19.87%-0.13%48.06%
BCH
Banco de Chile
11.91%81.24%6.15%23.37%41.22%-20.93%2.32%-24.00%-6.21%45.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BSAC and BCH is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2002

0.58

Over the past year, BSAC and BCH have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.58, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

BSAC:

CLP 2.88K

BCH:

CLP 2.26K

PE Ratio

BSAC:

10.32

BCH:

16.01

PEG Ratio

BSAC:

0.97

BCH:

1.00

PS Ratio

BSAC:

2.18

BCH:

5.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

BSAC:

CLP 4.82T

BCH:

CLP 3.07T

Gross Profit (TTM)

BSAC:

CLP 2.99T

BCH:

CLP 2.62T

EBITDA (TTM)

BSAC:

CLP 1.38T

BCH:

CLP 1.55T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSAC vs. BCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSAC
BSAC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BSAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BSAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

BCH
BCH Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCH Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSAC vs. BCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) and Banco de Chile (BCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSACBCHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.25

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

5.10

+0.80

BSAC vs. BCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the BCH Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSAC and BCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSAC vs. BCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSAC drawdown since its inception was -63.90%, which is greater than BCH's maximum drawdown of -57.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSAC and BCH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSACBCHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.90%

-57.68%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.42%

-19.99%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.67%

-19.99%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.02%

-26.93%

-10.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.90%

-57.68%

-6.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.86%

-8.27%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.31%

-12.89%

-6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.64%

8.81%

-1.17%

Volatility

BSAC vs. BCH - Volatility Comparison

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to Banco de Chile (BCH) at 8.42%. This indicates that BSAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSACBCHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.27%

8.42%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.45%

25.31%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.69%

30.22%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.50%

28.41%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.93%

29.22%

+1.71%

Dividends

BSAC vs. BCH - Dividend Comparison

BSAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than BCH's 5.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCH
Banco de Chile
5.46%5.54%7.46%9.01%6.39%3.76%3.95%5.04%3.55%2.20%3.32%4.35%
BSAC
Banco Santander-Chile
4.62%4.34%4.10%6.54%7.70%5.70%4.64%4.91%4.97%2.73%3.94%5.12%

Financials

BSAC vs. BCH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco Santander-Chile and Banco de Chile. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00B1.00T1.50T2.00T20222023202420252026
733.43B
1.05T
(BSAC) Total Revenue
(BCH) Total Revenue
Values in CLP except per share items

BSAC vs. BCH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Banco Santander-Chile and Banco de Chile over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
62.8%
Portfolio components
BSAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Santander-Chile reported a gross profit of 733.43B and revenue of 733.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BCH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco de Chile reported a gross profit of 661.74B and revenue of 1.05T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.8%.

BSAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Santander-Chile reported an operating income of 336.39B and revenue of 733.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.

BCH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco de Chile reported an operating income of 359.62B and revenue of 1.05T, resulting in an operating margin of 34.2%.

BSAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Santander-Chile reported a net income of 273.19B and revenue of 733.43B, resulting in a net margin of 37.3%.

BCH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco de Chile reported a net income of 278.58B and revenue of 1.05T, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BSAC and BCH have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSAC has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to BCH (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSAC dropped -63.90% vs BCH's -57.68%.

BSAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSAC and BCH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer