PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SQM vs. LIT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SQM and LIT is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

SQM vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.69%
8.33%
SQM
LIT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SQM:

-0.39

LIT:

-0.14

Sortino Ratio

SQM:

-0.31

LIT:

0.03

Omega Ratio

SQM:

0.97

LIT:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

SQM:

-0.26

LIT:

-0.07

Martin Ratio

SQM:

-0.86

LIT:

-0.36

Ulcer Index

SQM:

19.89%

LIT:

12.47%

Daily Std Dev

SQM:

43.59%

LIT:

32.60%

Max Drawdown

SQM:

-77.79%

LIT:

-62.61%

Current Drawdown

SQM:

-59.46%

LIT:

-54.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQM achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's 3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SQM has outperformed LIT with an annualized return of 9.90%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.06% annualized return.


SQM

YTD

10.45%

1M

7.73%

6M

1.08%

1Y

-15.75%

5Y*

11.88%

10Y*

9.90%

LIT

YTD

3.68%

1M

0.60%

6M

5.79%

1Y

-4.40%

5Y*

7.98%

10Y*

8.06%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SQM vs. LIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SQM is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SQM is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SQM is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SQM is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SQM is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SQM is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

LIT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LIT is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LIT is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LIT is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LIT is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LIT is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LIT is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SQM vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SQM, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.39-0.14
The chart of Sortino ratio for SQM, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.310.03
The chart of Omega ratio for SQM, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.971.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for SQM, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.26-0.07
The chart of Martin ratio for SQM, currently valued at -0.86, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.86-0.36
SQM
LIT

The current SQM Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQM and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.39
-0.14
SQM
LIT

Dividends

SQM vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than LIT's 0.90% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
0.53%0.59%8.51%9.79%3.90%1.65%4.59%5.41%2.39%5.31%2.41%5.83%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
0.90%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%1.07%

Drawdowns

SQM vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQM drawdown since its inception was -77.79%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQM and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-59.46%
-54.71%
SQM
LIT

Volatility

SQM vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 6.66%. This indicates that SQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.64%
6.66%
SQM
LIT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab