SQM vs. LIT
Compare and contrast key facts about Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).
LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SQM or LIT.
Correlation
The correlation between SQM and LIT is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SQM vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SQM:
-0.76
LIT:
-0.45
SQM:
-0.99
LIT:
-0.48
SQM:
0.89
LIT:
0.95
SQM:
-0.51
LIT:
-0.24
SQM:
-1.08
LIT:
-0.80
SQM:
31.23%
LIT:
18.56%
SQM:
44.35%
LIT:
33.05%
SQM:
-77.80%
LIT:
-62.61%
SQM:
-62.32%
LIT:
-55.25%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQM achieves a -37.74% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's -17.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SQM has outperformed LIT with an annualized return of 9.25%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively lower 7.94% annualized return.
SQM
-37.74%
-3.67%
-10.20%
-35.33%
11.69%
9.25%
LIT
-17.23%
-7.32%
5.17%
-12.32%
9.85%
7.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SQM vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SQM vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than LIT's 1.45% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 0.57% | 8.51% | 9.79% | 3.90% | 1.65% | 4.59% | 5.41% | 2.39% | 5.31% | 2.41% | 5.83% | 3.96% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 1.45% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% | 1.07% | 0.32% |
Drawdowns
SQM vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQM drawdown since its inception was -77.80%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQM and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SQM vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) has a higher volatility of 11.20% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 8.78%. This indicates that SQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.