SQM vs. LIT
SQM (Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.) is a stock, while LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Over the past 10 years, SQM returned 15.01%/yr vs 12.66%/yr for LIT. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
SQM vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQM achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 7.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SQM has outperformed LIT with an annualized return of 15.01%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.66% annualized return.
SQM
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- 6M
- -11.74%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- 89.78%
- 3Y*
- -1.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.73%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.71%
LIT
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -9.55%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 1Y
- 70.85%
- 3Y*
- 2.87%
- 5Y*
- -2.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.35M | $16.35M | $33.70M | |
| $66.47M | $68.86M | $87.99M |
SQM vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | -1.42% | 89.55% | -39.35% | -18.47% | 71.62% | 6.82% | 89.19% | -27.30% | -32.71% | 115.00% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 7.18% | 60.05% | -19.19% | -12.18% | -29.91% | 36.74% | 127.88% | 3.27% | -28.63% | 64.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQM and LIT is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2010 | 0.67 |
The correlation between SQM and LIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQM vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank
SQM
LIT
SQM vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQM | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.33 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 2.62 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.32 | 8.37 | -1.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQM vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQM drawdown since its inception was -78.34%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQM and LIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQM | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.34% | -65.91% | -12.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.91% | -26.84% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.55% | -49.14% | -7.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.76% | -65.91% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.98% | -65.91% | -7.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.59% | -25.06% | -6.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.30% | -33.48% | +3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.63% | 8.40% | +3.23% |
Volatility
SQM vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 9.34%. This indicates that SQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQM | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 9.34% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.74% | 25.15% | +11.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.16% | 34.47% | +15.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 31.93% | +17.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.25% | 30.80% | +15.45% |
Dividends
SQM vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than LIT's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.73% | 0.49% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 1.72% | 0.18% | 0.59% | 8.34% | 9.66% | 3.92% | 1.64% | 4.55% | 5.37% | 2.73% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQM and LIT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQM has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to LIT (9.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQM dropped -78.34% vs LIT's -65.91%.
LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQM and LIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer