BOTT vs. SPAM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) and Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM).

BOTT and SPAM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOTT is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Industrial Robotics & Automation Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Apr 19, 2024. SPAM is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Dec 7, 2023. Both BOTT and SPAM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BOTT vs. SPAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) and Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BOTT vs. SPAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BOTT Themes Robotics & Automation ETF	7.81%	55.56%	10.74%
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF	-5.88%	4.86%	12.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTT achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than SPAM's -5.88% return.

BOTT

• 1D: 4.19%
• 1M: -21.18%
• YTD: 7.81%
• 6M: 15.56%
• 1Y: 79.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPAM

• 1D: 3.78%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: -5.88%
• 6M: -17.32%
• 1Y: 1.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTT vs. SPAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BOTT and SPAM have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

BOTT

Themes Robotics & Automation ETF

SPAM

Themes Cybersecurity ETF

Return for Risk

BOTT vs. SPAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTT

BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 89
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 83

SPAM

SPAM Risk / Return Rank: 13
SPAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
SPAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SPAM Omega Ratio Rank: 14
SPAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SPAM Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTT vs. SPAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) and Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOTT	SPAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	0.07	+2.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	0.29	+2.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.04	+0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	0.01	+2.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.13	0.02	+9.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOTT vs. SPAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the SPAM Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTT and SPAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOTT	SPAM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	0.07	+2.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.16	0.27	+0.89

Correlation

The correlation between BOTT and SPAM is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BOTT vs. SPAM - Dividend Comparison

BOTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than SPAM's 0.52% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
BOTT Themes Robotics & Automation ETF	0.13%	0.14%	1.74%
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF	0.52%	0.49%	0.13%

Drawdowns

BOTT vs. SPAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTT drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, which is greater than SPAM's maximum drawdown of -24.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTT and SPAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTT	SPAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.74%	-24.02%	-6.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.74%	-24.02%	-6.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.84%	-20.11%	-7.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.77%	-6.37%	+0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.69%	9.78%	-1.09%

Volatility

BOTT vs. SPAM - Volatility Comparison

Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) has a higher volatility of 13.08% compared to Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) at 8.04%. This indicates that BOTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTT	SPAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.08%	8.04%	+5.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.46%	19.15%	+11.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.62%	26.80%	+10.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.68%	23.51%	+9.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.68%	23.51%	+9.17%