SPAM vs. HACK
Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK).
SPAM and HACK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPAM is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Dec 7, 2023. HACK is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014. Both SPAM and HACK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPAM or HACK.
Key characteristics
| SPAM | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.93% | 9.28% |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.82% | 18.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.19% | -42.68% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.21% | -2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPAM and HACK is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SPAM vs. HACK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SPAM achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 9.28% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPAM vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPAM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPAM vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
SPAM vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison
SPAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
SPAM vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPAM drawdown since its inception was -13.19%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAM and HACK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPAM vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison
Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) have volatilities of 5.15% and 5.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.