HUMN vs. CHAT

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HUMN returned 34.89% vs 110.84% for CHAT. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

HUMN vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 65.84% return.

HUMN

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -13.86%
• YTD: 11.75%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 34.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHAT

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: 3.82%
• YTD: 65.84%
• 6M: 64.65%
• 1Y: 110.84%
• 3Y*: 53.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	11.75%	20.70%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	65.84%	27.13%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and CHAT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.76

HUMN vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUMN	CHAT
Industrials	36.7%	3.5%
Technology	26.2%	77.8%
Consumer Cyclical	18.4%	2.4%
Basic Materials	6.9%	-
Communication Services	2.1%	16.1%
Financial Services	0.1%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUMN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 92
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUMN	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.44	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.48	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.85	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	18.87	—

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.40%	-31.34%	+10.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.40%	-16.28%	-4.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.26%	-6.04%	-8.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.72%	-5.39%	+0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	29.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.26%	34.79%	-3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.26%	31.21%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.26%	31.21%	+0.05%

HUMN vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HUMN and CHAT have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

HUMN vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than CHAT's 1.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.72%	2.85%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.65%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUMN and CHAT in my portfolio?

HUMN and CHAT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUMN or CHAT?

On 1-year performance, CHAT leads with 110.84% vs 34.89% for HUMN. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HUMN or CHAT?

Over the 1-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 110.84% return vs 34.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUMN or CHAT?

HUMN and CHAT have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUMN or CHAT?

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.65% for HUMN.

What is the main difference between HUMN and CHAT?

HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while CHAT is Technology Equities.