BNKU vs. FNGS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BNKU returned 100.75% vs 19.17% for FNGS. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BNKU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.

Performance

BNKU vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKU achieves a 31.56% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 12.53% return.

BNKU

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: 7.26%
• 6M: 22.79%
• YTD: 31.56%
• 1Y: 100.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 48.65%

FNGS

• 1D: 3.22%
• 1M: 3.83%
• 6M: 16.07%
• YTD: 12.53%
• 1Y: 19.17%
• 3Y*: 31.24%
• 5Y*: 19.42%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 31.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	$287.92K	$638.07K	$490.60K
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	$1.70M	$1.91M	$2.41M

BNKU vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	31.56%	34.97%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	12.53%	12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKU and FNGS is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.46

The correlation between BNKU and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BNKU vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BNKU	FNGS
Financial Services	100.0%	10.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	30.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	59.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BNKU vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BNKU

BNKU Risk / Return Rank: 63
BNKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BNKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BNKU Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BNKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BNKU Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 31
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BNKU vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BNKU	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	0.84	+0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	1.29	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.16	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	0.84	+1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.51	2.23	+4.28

BNKU vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKU Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKU and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BNKU vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKU drawdown since its inception was -61.21%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKU and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKU	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.21%	-48.98%	-12.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.97%	-22.93%	-18.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.02%	-4.76%	-1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.74%	-10.80%	-5.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.54%	8.61%	+6.93%

Volatility

BNKU vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) has a higher volatility of 18.49% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 6.65%. This indicates that BNKU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKU	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.49%	6.65%	+11.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.92%	18.60%	+28.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.32%	22.88%	+36.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.91%	30.33%	+41.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.91%	31.09%	+40.82%

BNKU vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNKU vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNKU nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKU and FNGS in my portfolio?

BNKU and FNGS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNKU or FNGS?

BNKU has higher volatility (18.49%) compared to FNGS (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKU dropped -61.21% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, BNKU or FNGS?

On 1-year performance, BNKU leads with 100.75% vs 19.17% for FNGS. On fees, FNGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNKU or FNGS?

Over the 1-year period, BNKU has performed better with a 100.75% return vs 19.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKU or FNGS?

FNGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BNKU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNKU or FNGS?

BNKU and FNGS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BNKU and FNGS?

BNKU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. BNKU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKU and 0.58% for FNGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.