BNKD vs. MSTZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ).

BNKD and MSTZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BNKD is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 2, 2019. MSTZ is an actively managed fund by REX. It was launched on Sep 17, 2024.

Performance

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	7.72%	-62.08%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-27.23%	-3.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -27.23% return.

BNKD

• 1D: -10.54%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 7.72%
• 6M: -19.30%
• 1Y: -68.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -5.53%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: -27.23%
• 6M: 137.26%
• 1Y: -11.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

MSTZ

T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF

BNKD

MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs

Return for Risk

BNKD vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKD

BNKD Risk / Return Rank: 1
BNKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BNKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BNKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BNKD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 20
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNKD	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.91	-0.08	-0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.72	1.02	-2.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.14	-0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	-0.12	-0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.02	-0.17	-0.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKD Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKD and MSTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNKD	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.91	-0.08	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.72	-0.53	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between BNKD and MSTZ is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNKD nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -84.27%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKD	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.27%	-99.36%	+15.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.27%	-83.20%	-1.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.83%	-97.45%	+18.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.01%	-93.91%	+32.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	68.67%	61.32%	+7.35%

Volatility

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) is 19.01%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 38.43%. This indicates that BNKD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKD	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.01%	38.43%	-19.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.69%	122.48%	-76.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.20%	147.15%	-71.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	77.02%	173.11%	-96.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	77.02%	173.11%	-96.09%