BNKD vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds from REX. BNKD is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, BNKD returned -68.88% vs 279.21% for MSTZ. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNKD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -37.77% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's 1.05% return.

BNKD

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: -23.52%
• YTD: -37.77%
• 6M: -33.35%
• 1Y: -68.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 19.27%
• 1M: 186.45%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 9.89%
• 1Y: 279.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-37.77%	-59.47%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	1.05%	-6.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKD and MSTZ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.29

Return for Risk

BNKD vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKD

BNKD Risk / Return Rank: 0
BNKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BNKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 62
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BNKD	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.19	1.93	-3.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.34	2.48	-4.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.32	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.01	3.31	-4.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.65	6.57	-8.23

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKD Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKD and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -87.96%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKD	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.96%	-99.38%	+11.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.06%	-84.89%	+16.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.77%	-96.56%	+8.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.83%	-94.46%	+29.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.72%	42.70%	+1.02%

Volatility

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) is 17.41%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 46.08%. This indicates that BNKD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKD	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.41%	46.08%	-28.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.55%	129.73%	-83.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.11%	145.84%	-87.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.83%	170.65%	-96.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.83%	170.65%	-96.82%

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNKD vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNKD nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKD and MSTZ in my portfolio?

BNKD and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNKD or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (46.08%) compared to BNKD (17.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKD dropped -87.96% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, BNKD or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 279.21% vs -68.88% for BNKD. On fees, BNKD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BNKD has been the lower-risk option at 17.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNKD or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 279.21% return vs -68.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKD or MSTZ?

BNKD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNKD or MSTZ?

BNKD and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BNKD and MSTZ?

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.