PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNKD vs. CEPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNKD vs. CEPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -19.99% return, which is significantly lower than CEPI's 20.71% return.


BNKD

1D
3.59%
1M
-8.82%
YTD
-19.99%
6M
-30.69%
1Y
-65.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CEPI

1D
-1.35%
1M
7.21%
YTD
20.71%
6M
18.40%
1Y
34.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKD vs. CEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BNKD and CEPI is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

-0.55

The correlation between BNKD and CEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.55 to -0.46 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNKD vs. CEPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKD
BNKD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BNKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKD Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CEPI
CEPI Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKD vs. CEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNKDCEPIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.15

1.28

-2.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.18

1.78

-3.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.24

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

1.52

-2.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.33

3.62

-4.95

BNKD vs. CEPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKD Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the CEPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKD and CEPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNKDCEPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.15

1.28

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.82

0.45

-1.27

Drawdowns

BNKD vs. CEPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -84.82%, which is greater than CEPI's maximum drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and CEPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNKDCEPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.82%

-29.48%

-55.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.85%

-22.47%

-45.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.28%

-2.08%

-82.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.01%

-8.65%

-55.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.30%

9.43%

+39.87%

Volatility

BNKD vs. CEPI - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) has a higher volatility of 14.65% compared to REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) at 5.92%. This indicates that BNKD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNKDCEPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.65%

5.92%

+8.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.42%

20.94%

+24.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.40%

26.79%

+30.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.17%

31.57%

+42.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.17%

31.57%

+42.60%

BNKD vs. CEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CEPI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNKD vs. CEPI - Dividend Comparison

BNKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.71%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BNKD and CEPI have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNKD has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to CEPI (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKD dropped -84.82% vs CEPI's -29.48%.

On 1-year performance, CEPI leads with 34.07% vs -65.56% for BNKD. On fees, CEPI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, CEPI has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CEPI has performed better with a 34.07% return vs -65.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CEPI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BNKD.

CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 42.71%, compared with 0.00% for BNKD.

BNKD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CEPI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 0.85% for CEPI.

CEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNKD and CEPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer