BNKD vs. FAZ
BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and FAZ (Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while FAZ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BNKD returned -68.89% vs -27.65% for FAZ. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BNKD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for FAZ.
Performance
BNKD vs. FAZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -44.22% return, which is significantly lower than FAZ's -13.28% return.
BNKD
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -9.38%
- 6M
- -40.18%
- YTD
- -44.22%
- 1Y
- -68.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -64.39%
FAZ
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -6.62%
- 6M
- -19.32%
- YTD
- -13.28%
- 1Y
- -27.65%
- 3Y*
- -39.34%
- 5Y*
- -32.28%
- 10Y*
- -44.48%
- ALL TIME*
- -53.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.77K | $10.66K | $9.79K | |
| $19.80M | $17.81M | $19.33M |
BNKD vs. FAZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -44.22% | -59.47% |
FAZ Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares | -13.28% | -21.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNKD and FAZ is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between BNKD and FAZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNKD vs. FAZ — Risk / Return Rank
BNKD
FAZ
BNKD vs. FAZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNKD | FAZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.94 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.56 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | -1.29 | -0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNKD vs. FAZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -89.57%, smaller than the maximum FAZ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and FAZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNKD | FAZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.57% | -100.00% | +10.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.40% | -42.80% | -27.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -88.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.04% | -100.00% | +10.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.47% | -99.12% | +32.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.82% | 18.45% | +25.37% |
Volatility
BNKD vs. FAZ - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) has a higher volatility of 17.97% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) at 11.94%. This indicates that BNKD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNKD | FAZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.97% | 11.94% | +6.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.29% | 32.77% | +14.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.18% | 44.05% | +16.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.03% | 55.31% | +17.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.03% | 61.87% | +11.16% |
BNKD vs. FAZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FAZ's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNKD vs. FAZ - Dividend Comparison
BNKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FAZ Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares | 3.57% | 5.07% | 7.34% | 4.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.63% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNKD and FAZ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNKD has higher volatility (17.97%) compared to FAZ (11.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKD dropped -89.57% vs FAZ's -100.00%.
On 1-year performance, FAZ leads with -27.65% vs -68.89% for BNKD. On fees, BNKD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, FAZ has been the lower-risk option at 11.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FAZ has performed better with a -27.65% return vs -68.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNKD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FAZ.
FAZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.00% for BNKD.
BNKD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while FAZ is Leveraged Equities. BNKD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while FAZ tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 1.07% for FAZ.
FAZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.54 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNKD and FAZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer