BNKD vs. EUFN
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN).
BNKD and EUFN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BNKD is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 2, 2019. EUFN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe Financials Index. It was launched on Jan 20, 2010. Both BNKD and EUFN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BNKD vs. EUFN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BNKD vs. EUFN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 7.72% | -62.08% |
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | -6.04% | 44.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than EUFN's -6.04% return.
BNKD
- 1D
- -10.54%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- -19.30%
- 1Y
- -68.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUFN
- 1D
- 4.25%
- 1M
- -7.58%
- YTD
- -6.04%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 29.23%
- 5Y*
- 17.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BNKD vs. EUFN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EUFN's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BNKD vs. EUFN — Risk / Return Rank
BNKD
EUFN
BNKD vs. EUFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNKD | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | 1.24 | -2.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | 1.76 | -3.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.24 | -0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 1.74 | -2.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 6.10 | -7.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNKD | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 1.24 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.72 | 0.25 | -0.97 |
Correlation
The correlation between BNKD and EUFN is -0.52. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
BNKD vs. EUFN - Dividend Comparison
BNKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 3.80% | 3.57% | 5.36% | 5.00% | 4.24% | 4.15% | 1.38% | 4.55% | 6.48% | 3.04% | 4.03% | 3.65% |
Drawdowns
BNKD vs. EUFN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -84.27%, which is greater than EUFN's maximum drawdown of -53.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and EUFN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNKD | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.27% | -53.25% | -31.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.27% | -14.77% | -69.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.83% | -10.30% | -68.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.01% | -14.68% | -46.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 68.67% | 4.22% | +64.45% |
Volatility
BNKD vs. EUFN - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) has a higher volatility of 19.01% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) at 9.84%. This indicates that BNKD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BNKD | EUFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.01% | 9.84% | +9.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.69% | 14.70% | +30.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.20% | 22.21% | +52.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.02% | 21.57% | +55.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.02% | 24.53% | +52.49% |