BNKD vs. CARD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds - BNKD tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%) while CARD tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BNKD returned -71.32% vs -30.65% for CARD. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

BNKD vs. CARD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -38.75% return, which is significantly lower than CARD's 5.96% return.

BNKD

• 1D: -2.15%
• 1M: -25.95%
• YTD: -38.75%
• 6M: -36.05%
• 1Y: -71.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CARD

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 5.96%
• 6M: 16.67%
• 1Y: -30.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKD vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-38.75%	-59.47%
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	5.96%	-53.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKD and CARD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.57

The correlation between BNKD and CARD shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BNKD vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKD

BNKD Risk / Return Rank: 0
BNKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CARD

CARD Risk / Return Rank: 5
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKD vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BNKD	CARD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.23	-0.44	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.52	-0.25	-2.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	0.97	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.02	-0.66	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.61	-0.97	-0.64

BNKD vs. CARD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKD Sharpe Ratio is -1.23, which is lower than the CARD Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKD and CARD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BNKD vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -87.96%, smaller than the maximum CARD drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and CARD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKD	CARD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.96%	-93.51%	+5.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.98%	-46.42%	-23.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.96%	-92.04%	+4.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.69%	-68.71%	+4.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.47%	31.50%	+14.97%

Volatility

BNKD vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) is 16.87%, while Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a volatility of 24.36%. This indicates that BNKD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKD	CARD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.87%	24.36%	-7.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.81%	52.63%	-5.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.19%	70.25%	-12.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.00%	80.74%	-6.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.00%	80.74%	-6.74%

BNKD vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BNKD and CARD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

BNKD vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNKD nor CARD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKD and CARD in my portfolio?

BNKD and CARD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNKD or CARD?

CARD has higher volatility (24.36%) compared to BNKD (16.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKD dropped -87.96% vs CARD's -93.51%.

Which ETF is better, BNKD or CARD?

On 1-year performance, CARD leads with -30.65% vs -71.32% for BNKD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BNKD has been the lower-risk option at 16.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNKD or CARD?

Over the 1-year period, CARD has performed better with a -30.65% return vs -71.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKD or CARD?

BNKD and CARD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNKD or CARD?

BNKD and CARD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BNKD and CARD?

BNKD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: REX and Max.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.