BNKD vs. KBWB
BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and KBWB (Invesco KBW Bank ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while KBWB is a Financials Equities fund tracking the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BNKD returned -69.69% vs 40.56% for KBWB. At a correlation of -0.97, they often move in opposite directions. BNKD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBWB.
Performance
BNKD vs. KBWB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than KBWB's 7.86% return.
BNKD
- 1D
- -10.32%
- 1M
- -15.34%
- YTD
- -28.25%
- 6M
- -36.58%
- 1Y
- -69.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBWB
- 1D
- 3.65%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 6M
- 11.77%
- 1Y
- 40.56%
- 3Y*
- 33.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
BNKD vs. KBWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -28.25% | -62.08% |
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF | 7.86% | 22.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNKD and KBWB is -0.96, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | -0.97 |
The correlation between BNKD and KBWB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.97 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
BNKD vs. KBWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BNKD
KBWB
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BNKD
KBWB
Basic Materials
BNKD
-
KBWB
-
Communication Services
BNKD
-
KBWB
-
Consumer Cyclical
BNKD
-
KBWB
-
Consumer Defensive
BNKD
-
KBWB
-
Energy
BNKD
-
KBWB
-
Healthcare
BNKD
-
KBWB
-
Industrials
BNKD
-
KBWB
-
Real Estate
BNKD
-
KBWB
-
Technology
BNKD
-
KBWB
-
Utilities
BNKD
-
KBWB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNKD vs. KBWB — Risk / Return Rank
BNKD
KBWB
BNKD vs. KBWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNKD | KBWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.35 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 2.49 | -3.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 7.82 | -9.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNKD | KBWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.20 | 2.01 | -3.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | 0.51 | -1.36 |
Drawdowns
BNKD vs. KBWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than KBWB's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and KBWB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNKD | KBWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -50.27% | -35.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.14% | -16.38% | -53.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.90% | 0.00% | -85.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.08% | -11.74% | -52.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.49% | 5.20% | +44.29% |
Volatility
BNKD vs. KBWB - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) has a higher volatility of 17.80% compared to Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) at 6.16%. This indicates that BNKD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNKD | KBWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.80% | 6.16% | +11.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.63% | 15.88% | +30.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.20% | 20.34% | +37.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.59% | 26.67% | +47.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.59% | 29.21% | +45.38% |
BNKD vs. KBWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNKD vs. KBWB - Dividend Comparison
BNKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF | 1.99% | 2.04% | 2.46% | 3.20% | 3.05% | 2.13% | 2.62% | 2.38% | 2.54% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNKD and KBWB have a correlation of -0.96, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNKD has higher volatility (17.80%) compared to KBWB (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKD dropped -85.90% vs KBWB's -50.27%.
On 1-year performance, KBWB leads with 40.56% vs -69.69% for BNKD. On fees, KBWB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KBWB has been the lower-risk option at 6.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 40.56% return vs -69.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KBWB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BNKD.
KBWB has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for BNKD.
BNKD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while KBWB is Financials Equities. BNKD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: REX and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 0.35% for KBWB.
KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNKD and KBWB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer