BLGR vs. GQGU
BLGR (Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. BLGR charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
BLGR vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLGR achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 4.53% return.
BLGR
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLGR vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF | 5.42% | 11.10% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 4.53% | -1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLGR and GQGU is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLGR vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
BLGR
GQGU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLGR vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLGR | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLGR vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLGR drawdown since its inception was -14.08%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLGR and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLGR | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.08% | -8.41% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.77% | -6.51% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -2.72% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | — | — |
Volatility
BLGR vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLGR | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 10.52% | +5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 10.52% | +5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 10.52% | +5.52% |
BLGR vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLGR has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLGR vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
BLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than GQGU's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.24% | 0.17% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLGR and GQGU have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLGR is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLGR is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GQGU.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.24% for BLGR.
They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BLGR and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for BLGR and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer