BLES vs. POW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BLES (Inspire Global Hope ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLES is a Global Equities fund tracking the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. BLES is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLES charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

BLES vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 12.46% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 35.68% return.

BLES

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 7.79%
• YTD: 12.46%
• 1Y: 19.94%
• 3Y*: 13.98%
• 5Y*: 8.22%
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -13.79%
• 6M: 25.01%
• YTD: 35.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLES vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	12.46%	0.13%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	35.68%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BLES and POW is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.66

Return for Risk

BLES vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLES

BLES Risk / Return Rank: 59
BLES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BLES Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BLES Omega Ratio Rank: 56
BLES Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BLES Martin Ratio Rank: 64

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLES vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLES	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.01	—	—

Drawdowns

BLES vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLES	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.35%	-20.28%	-20.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-20.28%	+19.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.98%	-4.56%	-1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLES	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.77%	33.06%	-20.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.46%	33.06%	-16.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.88%	33.06%	-14.18%

BLES vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLES has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLES vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	1.82%	1.97%	1.90%	1.80%	1.64%	9.28%	1.61%	2.16%	1.73%	2.01%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLES and POW in my portfolio?

BLES and POW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLES or POW?

On fees, BLES is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLES or POW?

BLES is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLES or POW?

BLES has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between BLES and POW?

BLES is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BLES and 0.75% for POW.