BLES vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
BLES and SCHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BLES is a passively managed fund by Inspire that tracks the performance of the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Feb 28, 2017. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011. Both BLES and SCHD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BLES or SCHD.
Performance
BLES vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.85% return.
BLES
11.10%
1.30%
4.98%
20.29%
9.69%
N/A
SCHD
18.85%
3.78%
14.95%
27.79%
13.14%
11.69%
Key characteristics
| BLES | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.54 | 2.49 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.10 | 3.58 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.44 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.13 | 3.79 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.22 | 13.58 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.20% | 2.05% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.17% | 11.15% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.35% | -33.37% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.76% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BLES vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLES has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between BLES and SCHD is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BLES vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BLES vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than SCHD's 3.33% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF | 1.92% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 9.28% | 1.61% | 2.15% | 2.39% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 3.33% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 2.63% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
BLES vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BLES vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) is 3.23%, while Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that BLES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.