PortfoliosLab logo
BLES vs. BIBL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BLES and BIBL is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

BLES vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%110.00%120.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
75.52%
98.05%
BLES
BIBL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLES:

0.52

BIBL:

0.31

Sortino Ratio

BLES:

0.85

BIBL:

0.58

Omega Ratio

BLES:

1.12

BIBL:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

BLES:

0.59

BIBL:

0.32

Martin Ratio

BLES:

2.49

BIBL:

1.16

Ulcer Index

BLES:

3.69%

BIBL:

5.62%

Daily Std Dev

BLES:

17.66%

BIBL:

21.08%

Max Drawdown

BLES:

-40.35%

BIBL:

-36.12%

Current Drawdown

BLES:

-2.27%

BIBL:

-8.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly higher than BIBL's -0.49% return.


BLES

YTD

4.68%

1M

1.43%

6M

1.68%

1Y

8.05%

5Y*

14.21%

10Y*

N/A

BIBL

YTD

-0.49%

1M

-0.85%

6M

-2.05%

1Y

6.33%

5Y*

12.15%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BLES vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLES has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for BLES: current value is 0.52%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BLES: 0.52%
Expense ratio chart for BIBL: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BIBL: 0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLES vs. BIBL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLES
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLES is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLES is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLES is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLES is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLES is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLES is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIBL is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIBL is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIBL is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIBL is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIBL is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIBL is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLES vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for BLES, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
BLES: 0.52
BIBL: 0.31
The chart of Sortino ratio for BLES, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
BLES: 0.85
BIBL: 0.58
The chart of Omega ratio for BLES, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
BLES: 1.12
BIBL: 1.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for BLES, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
BLES: 0.59
BIBL: 0.32
The chart of Martin ratio for BLES, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
BLES: 2.49
BIBL: 1.16

The current BLES Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLES and BIBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.52
0.31
BLES
BIBL

Dividends

BLES vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than BIBL's 1.03% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
BLES
Inspire Global Hope ETF
1.66%1.90%1.80%1.64%9.28%1.61%2.16%2.39%1.99%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
1.03%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.62%0.31%

Drawdowns

BLES vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than BIBL's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and BIBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-2.27%
-8.54%
BLES
BIBL

Volatility

BLES vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) is 12.12%, while Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) has a volatility of 14.49%. This indicates that BLES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.12%
14.49%
BLES
BIBL