PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLES vs. WWJD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BLES vs. WWJD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BLES vs. WWJD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BLES
Inspire Global Hope ETF
2.87%19.25%5.59%16.47%-16.21%24.36%12.22%11.49%
WWJD
Inspire International ESG ETF
2.49%29.28%1.05%16.42%-14.60%16.60%12.91%11.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than WWJD's 2.49% return.


BLES

1D
2.53%
1M
-5.71%
YTD
2.87%
6M
5.21%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*

WWJD

1D
3.26%
1M
-6.62%
YTD
2.49%
6M
6.87%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
13.49%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BLES vs. WWJD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLES has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than WWJD's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BLES vs. WWJD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLES
BLES Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BLES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLES Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BLES Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLES Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

WWJD
WWJD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
WWJD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWJD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWJD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WWJD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWJD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLES vs. WWJD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLESWWJDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

1.44

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

2.06

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.13

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.76

8.74

-0.98

BLES vs. WWJD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLES Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the WWJD Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLES and WWJD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLESWWJDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.44

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.46

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.54

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between BLES and WWJD is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BLES vs. WWJD - Dividend Comparison

BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than WWJD's 2.31% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLES
Inspire Global Hope ETF
1.93%1.97%1.90%1.80%1.64%9.28%1.61%2.16%1.73%2.01%
WWJD
Inspire International ESG ETF
2.31%2.58%2.99%2.56%2.09%15.22%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BLES vs. WWJD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than WWJD's maximum drawdown of -35.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and WWJD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BLESWWJDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.35%

-35.76%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-11.37%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.61%

-29.51%

+2.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.84%

-6.97%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-7.09%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.77%

-0.20%

Volatility

BLES vs. WWJD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) is 5.73%, while Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that BLES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWJD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BLESWWJDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

7.63%

-1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

10.46%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.59%

17.21%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.42%

16.61%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.03%

20.18%

-1.15%