BLES vs. IWB
BLES (Inspire Global Hope ETF) and IWB (iShares Russell 1000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLES is a Global Equities fund tracking the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while IWB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLES returned 7.67%/yr vs 12.99%/yr for IWB. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLES charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IWB.
Performance
BLES vs. IWB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than IWB's 10.54% return.
BLES
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 13.98%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
IWB
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 27.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
BLES vs. IWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF | 12.57% | 19.25% | 5.59% | 16.47% | -16.21% | 24.36% | 12.22% | 28.39% | -13.43% | 15.23% |
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 10.54% | 17.18% | 24.32% | 26.39% | -19.19% | 26.32% | 20.77% | 31.06% | -4.90% | 14.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLES and IWB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between BLES and IWB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
BLES vs. IWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLES
IWB
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
BLES
IWB
Technology
BLES
IWB
Financial Services
BLES
IWB
Basic Materials
BLES
IWB
Real Estate
BLES
IWB
Healthcare
BLES
IWB
Energy
BLES
IWB
Utilities
BLES
IWB
Consumer Cyclical
BLES
IWB
Consumer Defensive
BLES
IWB
Communication Services
BLES
IWB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLES vs. IWB — Risk / Return Rank
BLES
IWB
BLES vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLES | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 2.28 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.78 | 3.12 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.41 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.06 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.70 | 14.09 | -2.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLES | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.28 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.76 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.45 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
BLES vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, smaller than the maximum IWB drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and IWB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLES | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.35% | -55.38% | +15.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -8.86% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.46% | -19.09% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.61% | -25.20% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.71% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.05% | -10.86% | +4.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 1.92% | +0.26% |
Volatility
BLES vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison
Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) at 2.88%. This indicates that BLES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLES | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 2.88% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 8.97% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43% | 11.93% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 17.10% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 18.14% | +0.80% |
BLES vs. IWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLES has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IWB's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLES vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison
BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than IWB's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF | 1.76% | 1.97% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.64% | 9.28% | 1.61% | 2.16% | 1.73% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 0.91% | 1.00% | 1.14% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLES and IWB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLES has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to IWB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLES dropped -40.35% vs IWB's -55.38%.
On 5-year performance, IWB leads with 12.99% vs 7.67% for BLES. On fees, IWB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IWB has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IWB has performed better with a 12.99% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BLES.
BLES has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.91% for IWB.
BLES is categorized as Global Equities, while IWB is Large Cap Blend Equities. BLES tracks Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while IWB tracks Russell 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BLES and 0.15% for IWB.
IWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLES and IWB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer