BLES vs. IWB
Compare and contrast key facts about Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB).
BLES and IWB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BLES is a passively managed fund by Inspire that tracks the performance of the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Feb 28, 2017. IWB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. Both BLES and IWB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BLES or IWB.
Correlation
The correlation between BLES and IWB is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BLES vs. IWB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BLES:
0.05
IWB:
0.31
BLES:
0.16
IWB:
0.49
BLES:
1.02
IWB:
1.07
BLES:
0.10
IWB:
0.37
BLES:
0.23
IWB:
1.40
BLES:
3.01%
IWB:
3.24%
BLES:
13.92%
IWB:
14.90%
BLES:
-40.35%
IWB:
-55.38%
BLES:
-7.06%
IWB:
-12.39%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly higher than IWB's -8.21% return.
BLES
-0.45%
-2.87%
-5.73%
0.23%
16.71%
N/A
IWB
-8.21%
-6.62%
-4.66%
4.41%
18.40%
11.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BLES vs. IWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLES has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than IWB's 0.15% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BLES vs. IWB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BLES
IWB
BLES vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BLES vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison
BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than IWB's 1.24% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF | 1.74% | 1.90% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 9.28% | 1.61% | 2.15% | 2.39% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% | 1.71% |
Drawdowns
BLES vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, smaller than the maximum IWB drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and IWB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BLES vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) is 5.54%, while iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that BLES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.