BLES vs. BDVL
BLES (Inspire Global Hope ETF) and BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds - BLES tracks the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index while BDVL tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLES charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BDVL.
Performance
BLES vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 4.71% return.
BLES
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 6M
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- —
BDVL
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 4.71%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLES vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF | 11.95% | 2.72% |
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 4.71% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLES and BDVL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.83 |
BLES vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLES
BDVL
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
BLES
BDVL
Technology
BLES
BDVL
Financial Services
BLES
BDVL
Basic Materials
BLES
BDVL
Real Estate
BLES
BDVL
Healthcare
BLES
BDVL
Energy
BLES
BDVL
Utilities
BLES
BDVL
Consumer Cyclical
BLES
BDVL
Consumer Defensive
BLES
BDVL
Communication Services
BLES
BDVL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLES vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank
BLES
BDVL
BLES vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLES | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.93 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLES | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.01 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
BLES vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and BDVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLES | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.35% | -7.71% | -32.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.95% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.05% | -1.19% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | — | — |
Volatility
BLES vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLES | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43% | 9.49% | +2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 9.49% | +6.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 9.49% | +9.45% |
BLES vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLES has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLES vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison
BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than BDVL's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 2.66% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.64% | 9.28% | 1.61% | 2.16% | 1.73% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLES and BDVL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BLES.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 1.77% for BLES.
BLES tracks Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BLES and 0.40% for BDVL.
Find the right allocation for BLES and BDVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer