PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLES vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLES vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 4.60% return.


BLES

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
10.01%
6M
9.13%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*

BDVL

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
4.60%
6M
3.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLES vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BLES and BDVL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025

0.84

BLES vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLES
BDVL

Industrials

20.3%
14.2%

Technology

17.6%
27.8%

Financial Services

13.0%
14.3%

Basic Materials

9.8%
1.9%

Real Estate

7.6%
0.9%

Healthcare

7.0%
8.3%

Utilities

7.0%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
6.9%

Energy

6.0%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
5.3%

Communication Services

1.0%
10.0%

Industrials

BLES
20.3%
BDVL
14.2%

Technology

BLES
17.6%
BDVL
27.8%

Financial Services

BLES
13.0%
BDVL
14.3%

Basic Materials

BLES
9.8%
BDVL
1.9%

Real Estate

BLES
7.6%
BDVL
0.9%

Healthcare

BLES
7.0%
BDVL
8.3%

Utilities

BLES
7.0%
BDVL
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BLES
6.3%
BDVL
6.9%

Energy

BLES
6.0%
BDVL
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

BLES
4.4%
BDVL
5.3%

Communication Services

BLES
1.0%
BDVL
10.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLES vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLES
BLES Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BLES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLES Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BLES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLES Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BDVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLES vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLESBDVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

BLES vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLES vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLESBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.35%

-7.71%

-32.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-1.53%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-1.18%

-4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

Volatility

BLES vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLESBDVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

9.69%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

9.69%

+6.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

9.69%

+9.24%

BLES vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLES has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLES vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than BDVL's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF
3.56%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BLES
Inspire Global Hope ETF
1.80%1.97%1.90%1.80%1.64%9.28%1.61%2.16%1.73%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLES and BDVL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BLES.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 1.80% for BLES.

BLES tracks Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BLES and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLES and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer