BLES vs. BDVL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL).

BLES and BDVL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BLES is a passively managed fund by Inspire that tracks the performance of the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Feb 27, 2017. BDVL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2025. Both BLES and BDVL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BLES vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BLES vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	2.87%	2.72%
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF	-0.63%	1.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's -0.63% return.

BLES

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: -5.71%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 5.21%
• 1Y: 20.00%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: —

BDVL

• 1D: 2.08%
• 1M: -5.45%
• YTD: -0.63%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLES vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLES has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.

BLES

Inspire Global Hope ETF

BDVL

iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF

Return for Risk

BLES vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLES

BLES Risk / Return Rank: 70
BLES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BLES Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
BLES Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BLES Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
BLES Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLES vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLES	BDVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.76	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLES	BDVL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.27	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between BLES and BDVL is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BLES vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than BDVL's 2.81% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	1.93%	1.97%	1.90%	1.80%	1.64%	9.28%	1.61%	2.16%	1.73%	2.01%
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF	2.81%	2.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BLES vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and BDVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLES	BDVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.35%	-7.71%	-32.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.84%	-5.45%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.14%	-1.17%	-4.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLES	BDVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.73%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.59%	9.29%	+7.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.42%	9.29%	+7.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.03%	9.29%	+9.74%