PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLD vs. EQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BLD vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TopBuild Corp. (BLD) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLD achieves a -1.46% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's -2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, BLD has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 27.86%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.39% annualized return.


BLD

1D
0.30%
1M
0.55%
YTD
-1.46%
6M
-5.70%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
27.86%

EQT

1D
1.45%
1M
-7.13%
YTD
-2.55%
6M
-6.00%
1Y
-5.35%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
3.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLD vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLD
TopBuild Corp.
-1.46%34.00%-16.81%139.16%-43.28%49.89%78.58%129.07%-40.59%112.75%
EQT
EQT Corporation
-2.55%17.64%21.41%16.20%57.64%71.60%17.27%-41.82%-38.82%-12.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BLD and EQT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015

0.19

The correlation between BLD and EQT shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLD:

$11.56B

EQT:

$32.47B

EPS

BLD:

$17.76

EQT:

$5.40

PE Ratio

BLD:

23.15

EQT:

9.61

PEG Ratio

BLD:

1.12

EQT:

0.08

PS Ratio

BLD:

2.07

EQT:

3.21

PB Ratio

BLD:

4.81

EQT:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLD:

$5.62B

EQT:

$10.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLD:

$1.62B

EQT:

$6.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

BLD:

$933.40M

EQT:

$7.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLD vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLD
BLD Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

EQT
EQT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLD vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TopBuild Corp. (BLD) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLDEQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.00

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

-0.22

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

-0.47

+2.58

BLD vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLD and EQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLD vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLD drawdown since its inception was -52.26%, smaller than the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLD and EQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLDEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.26%

-91.51%

+39.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.12%

-24.42%

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.41%

-31.62%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.39%

-42.56%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.26%

-88.28%

+36.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.38%

-23.32%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.10%

-23.34%

+8.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.68%

11.47%

+4.21%

Volatility

BLD vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

TopBuild Corp. (BLD) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 8.36%. This indicates that BLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLDEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.02%

8.36%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.81%

21.09%

+12.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.80%

32.56%

+11.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.43%

42.79%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.78%

48.90%

-6.12%

Dividends

BLD vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

BLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLD
TopBuild Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.26%1.19%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%0.42%0.21%0.18%0.23%

Financials

BLD vs. EQT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TopBuild Corp. and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20222023202420252026
1.45B
3.38B
(BLD) Total Revenue
(EQT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BLD vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TopBuild Corp. and EQT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
27.7%
98.4%
Portfolio components
BLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TopBuild Corp. reported a gross profit of 400.25M and revenue of 1.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.7%.

EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.

BLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TopBuild Corp. reported an operating income of 175.04M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.

BLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TopBuild Corp. reported a net income of 104.81M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BLD and EQT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLD has higher volatility (9.02%) compared to EQT (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLD dropped -52.26% vs EQT's -91.51%.

BLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLD and EQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer