PortfoliosLab logo
BLD vs. CLS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BLD and CLS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BLD vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TopBuild Corp. (BLD) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLD:

-0.75

CLS:

1.35

Sortino Ratio

BLD:

-0.86

CLS:

1.80

Omega Ratio

BLD:

0.90

CLS:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

BLD:

-0.70

CLS:

1.75

Martin Ratio

BLD:

-1.10

CLS:

4.29

Ulcer Index

BLD:

27.14%

CLS:

21.95%

Daily Std Dev

BLD:

42.65%

CLS:

75.47%

Max Drawdown

BLD:

-52.26%

CLS:

-96.93%

Current Drawdown

BLD:

-40.95%

CLS:

-19.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLD:

$8.08B

CLS:

$13.41B

EPS

BLD:

$19.72

CLS:

$3.58

PE Ratio

BLD:

14.33

CLS:

32.51

PEG Ratio

BLD:

0.00

CLS:

19.42

PS Ratio

BLD:

1.53

CLS:

1.33

PB Ratio

BLD:

3.82

CLS:

8.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLD:

$5.28B

CLS:

$10.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLD:

$1.59B

CLS:

$1.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

BLD:

$1.01B

CLS:

$724.86M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLD achieves a -9.14% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 25.01% return.


BLD

YTD

-9.14%

1M

-4.35%

6M

-27.58%

1Y

-31.56%

3Y*

12.77%

5Y*

19.79%

10Y*

N/A

CLS

YTD

25.01%

1M

35.18%

6M

35.36%

1Y

101.01%

3Y*

118.70%

5Y*

76.27%

10Y*

24.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TopBuild Corp.

Celestica Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLD vs. CLS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLD is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLD is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLD is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLD is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLD is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLD is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLS is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLS is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLS is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLS is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLS is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLS is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLD vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TopBuild Corp. (BLD) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BLD Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLD and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BLD vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLD nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BLD vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLD drawdown since its inception was -52.26%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLD and CLS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BLD vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TopBuild Corp. (BLD) is 11.51%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 14.80%. This indicates that BLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BLD vs. CLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TopBuild Corp. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
1.23B
2.65B
(BLD) Total Revenue
(CLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BLD vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TopBuild Corp. and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
28.5%
10.3%
(BLD) Gross Margin
(CLS) Gross Margin
BLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TopBuild Corp. reported a gross profit of 351.47M and revenue of 1.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.5%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 273.90M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.3%.

BLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TopBuild Corp. reported an operating income of 177.49M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 128.80M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

BLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TopBuild Corp. reported a net income of 123.39M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 86.20M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.