BKNG vs. SLB
BKNG (Booking Holdings Inc.) and SLB (Schlumberger Limited) are both stocks. BKNG operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical), while SLB operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, BKNG returned 12.44%/yr vs -0.34%/yr for SLB. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BKNG vs. SLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKNG achieves a -22.63% return, which is significantly lower than SLB's 48.01% return. Over the past 10 years, BKNG has outperformed SLB with an annualized return of 12.44%, while SLB has yielded a comparatively lower -0.34% annualized return.
BKNG
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- -22.63%
- 6M
- -21.85%
- 1Y
- -23.87%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
SLB
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 48.01%
- 6M
- 44.00%
- 1Y
- 61.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- -0.34%
BKNG vs. SLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | -22.63% | 8.59% | 41.31% | 76.02% | -16.00% | 7.72% | 8.45% | 19.24% | -0.88% | 18.53% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 48.01% | 3.27% | -24.47% | -0.78% | 81.15% | 40.30% | -43.81% | 17.73% | -44.66% | -17.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKNG and SLB is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 1999 | 0.27 |
The correlation between BKNG and SLB shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BKNG:
$7.60
SLB:
$3.04
BKNG:
21.71
SLB:
18.45
BKNG:
0.32
SLB:
0.87
BKNG:
4.82
SLB:
1.70
BKNG:
$27.69B
SLB:
$35.94B
BKNG:
$22.16B
SLB:
$4.90B
BKNG:
$9.27B
SLB:
$5.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKNG vs. SLB — Risk / Return Rank
BKNG
SLB
BKNG vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKNG | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.31 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 4.36 | -5.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 10.97 | -12.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKNG vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKNG drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than SLB's maximum drawdown of -87.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKNG and SLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKNG | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.32% | -87.64% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.35% | -14.30% | -19.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -46.63% | +13.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.53% | -46.63% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.77% | -84.29% | +36.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.50% | -33.53% | +5.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.05% | -31.18% | -15.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.53% | 5.67% | +11.86% |
Volatility
BKNG vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) is 6.54%, while Schlumberger Limited (SLB) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that BKNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKNG | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 9.50% | -2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.83% | 25.72% | +1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.94% | 33.73% | -1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.26% | 37.63% | -5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.45% | 40.41% | -7.96% |
Dividends
BKNG vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison
BKNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than SLB's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 2.06% | 2.97% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% |
Financials
BKNG vs. SLB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booking Holdings Inc. and Schlumberger Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BKNG vs. SLB - Profitability Comparison
BKNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BKNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
SLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
BKNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.
SLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a net income of 752.00M and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BKNG and SLB have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLB has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to BKNG (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKNG dropped -99.32% vs SLB's -87.64%.
SLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKNG and SLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer