PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKLC vs. SWERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKLC vs. SWERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKLC achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly higher than SWERX's 9.28% return.


BKLC

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.93%
6M
10.81%
1Y
28.05%
3Y*
23.25%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*

SWERX

1D
0.19%
1M
3.86%
YTD
9.28%
6M
9.85%
1Y
22.49%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
10.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKLC vs. SWERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
10.93%18.06%25.56%30.88%-20.52%27.41%37.38%
SWERX
Schwab Target 2040 Fund
9.28%17.71%12.74%19.06%-18.57%15.65%33.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BKLC and SWERX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020

0.91

The correlation between BKLC and SWERX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKLC vs. SWERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SWERX
SWERX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SWERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWERX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SWERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWERX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKLC vs. SWERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKLCSWERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.82

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

12.49

+1.66

BKLC vs. SWERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the SWERX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKLC and SWERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKLCSWERXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.28

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.55

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.53

+0.59

Drawdowns

BKLC vs. SWERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLC drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum SWERX drawdown of -48.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLC and SWERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKLCSWERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-48.24%

+22.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-8.08%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-13.05%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-30.40%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

0.00%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-7.15%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.82%

+0.17%

Volatility

BKLC vs. SWERX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) have volatilities of 3.00% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKLCSWERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

2.93%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

7.92%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

10.00%

+2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

14.99%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

14.84%

+2.60%

BKLC vs. SWERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKLC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWERX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKLC vs. SWERX - Dividend Comparison

BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than SWERX's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.01%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWERX
Schwab Target 2040 Fund
6.58%7.19%5.00%3.83%8.31%6.96%3.33%7.69%8.57%4.13%6.76%10.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BKLC and SWERX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BKLC has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to SWERX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKLC dropped -26.14% vs SWERX's -48.24%.

BKLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKLC and SWERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer