PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWERX vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWERX vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWERX achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 14.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SWERX has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 10.19%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.12% annualized return.


SWERX

1D
0.19%
1M
3.86%
YTD
9.28%
6M
9.85%
1Y
22.49%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
10.19%

AAPL

1D
-1.57%
1M
12.18%
YTD
14.34%
6M
9.39%
1Y
53.24%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
20.38%
10Y*
30.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWERX vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWERX
Schwab Target 2040 Fund
9.28%17.71%12.74%19.06%-18.57%15.65%14.44%23.01%-9.11%20.48%
AAPL
Apple Inc
14.34%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SWERX and AAPL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2005

0.55

The correlation between SWERX and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWERX vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWERX
SWERX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SWERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWERX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SWERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWERX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWERX vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWERXAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.88

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.49

9.76

+2.73

SWERX vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWERX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWERX and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWERXAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.40

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.75

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

1.05

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.44

+0.09

Drawdowns

SWERX vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWERX drawdown since its inception was -48.24%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWERX and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWERXAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.24%

-81.80%

+33.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-13.80%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.05%

-33.36%

+20.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.40%

-33.36%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

-38.52%

+8.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.57%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-29.61%

+22.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

5.47%

-3.65%

Volatility

SWERX vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) is 2.93%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that SWERX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWERXAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

5.46%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

15.91%

-7.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.00%

22.32%

-12.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

27.46%

-12.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

28.89%

-14.05%

Dividends

SWERX vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

SWERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
SWERX
Schwab Target 2040 Fund
6.58%7.19%5.00%3.83%8.31%6.96%3.33%7.69%8.57%4.13%6.76%10.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWERX and AAPL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to SWERX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWERX dropped -48.24% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWERX and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer