PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWERX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWERX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWERX achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SWERX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.24%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


SWERX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.18%
YTD
8.92%
6M
8.71%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
10.24%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWERX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWERX
Schwab Target 2040 Fund
8.92%17.71%12.74%19.06%-18.57%15.65%14.44%23.01%-9.11%20.48%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SWERX and VOO is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.95

The correlation between SWERX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWERX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWERX
SWERX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SWERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWERX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SWERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWERX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWERX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWERXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

3.02

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

13.58

-1.86

SWERX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWERX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWERX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWERX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWERX drawdown since its inception was -48.24%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWERX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWERXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.24%

-33.99%

-14.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-8.90%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.05%

-18.69%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.40%

-24.52%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

-33.99%

+3.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-1.74%

+1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-3.68%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.98%

-0.13%

Volatility

SWERX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Target 2040 Fund (SWERX) is 4.11%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that SWERX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWERXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.60%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

9.73%

-1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57%

12.39%

-1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.07%

16.90%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.87%

18.05%

-3.18%

SWERX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWERX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWERX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

SWERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWERX
Schwab Target 2040 Fund
6.60%7.19%5.00%3.83%8.31%6.96%3.33%7.69%8.57%4.13%6.76%10.85%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SWERX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOO has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to SWERX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWERX dropped -48.24% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWERX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer