BKIE vs. FEDM
BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) and FEDM (FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - BKIE tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index while FEDM tracks the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKIE returned 17.90%/yr vs 14.54%/yr for FEDM. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BKIE charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for FEDM.
Performance
BKIE vs. FEDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKIE achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly higher than FEDM's 6.95% return.
BKIE
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 23.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- —
FEDM
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 8.83%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKIE vs. FEDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 9.30% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 1.58% |
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 6.95% | 26.85% | 2.85% | 17.39% | -15.25% | 1.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKIE and FEDM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021 | 0.96 |
The correlation between BKIE and FEDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
BKIE vs. FEDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKIE
FEDM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
BKIE
FEDM
Industrials
BKIE
FEDM
Technology
BKIE
FEDM
Healthcare
BKIE
FEDM
Consumer Cyclical
BKIE
FEDM
Basic Materials
BKIE
FEDM
Consumer Defensive
BKIE
FEDM
Energy
BKIE
FEDM
Communication Services
BKIE
FEDM
Utilities
BKIE
FEDM
Real Estate
BKIE
FEDM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKIE vs. FEDM — Risk / Return Rank
BKIE
FEDM
BKIE vs. FEDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKIE | FEDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.20 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 1.41 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 5.07 | +2.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKIE | FEDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.04 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.47 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
BKIE vs. FEDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKIE drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, roughly equal to the maximum FEDM drawdown of -29.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIE and FEDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKIE | FEDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -29.37% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -11.92% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.19% | -14.24% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -1.16% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -6.99% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.30% | -0.35% |
Volatility
BKIE vs. FEDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) is 4.31%, while FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that BKIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKIE | FEDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.71% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.19% | 12.47% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 16.14% | -1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 16.46% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 16.46% | -0.13% |
BKIE vs. FEDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKIE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FEDM's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BKIE vs. FEDM - Dividend Comparison
BKIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than FEDM's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% |
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 2.80% | 2.97% | 2.94% | 2.61% | 2.53% | 0.62% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKIE and FEDM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEDM has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to BKIE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIE dropped -28.19% vs FEDM's -29.37%.
On 3-year performance, BKIE leads with 17.90% vs 14.54% for FEDM. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 17.90% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for FEDM.
BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.80% for FEDM.
BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index, while FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKIE and 0.12% for FEDM.
BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKIE and FEDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer