PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKIE vs. FEDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKIE vs. FEDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKIE achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly higher than FEDM's 6.95% return.


BKIE

1D
0.78%
1M
2.61%
YTD
9.30%
6M
11.55%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*

FEDM

1D
0.86%
1M
2.92%
YTD
6.95%
6M
8.83%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKIE vs. FEDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
9.30%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%1.58%
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
6.95%26.85%2.85%17.39%-15.25%1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BKIE and FEDM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021

0.96

The correlation between BKIE and FEDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKIE vs. FEDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKIE
FEDM

Financial Services

25.8%
27.1%

Industrials

18.6%
17.8%

Technology

10.1%
10.9%

Healthcare

9.1%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
5.7%

Basic Materials

7.2%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
7.1%

Energy

5.9%
5.7%

Communication Services

4.2%
4.6%

Utilities

3.7%
3.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.8%

Financial Services

BKIE
25.8%
FEDM
27.1%

Industrials

BKIE
18.6%
FEDM
17.8%

Technology

BKIE
10.1%
FEDM
10.9%

Healthcare

BKIE
9.1%
FEDM
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BKIE
7.3%
FEDM
5.7%

Basic Materials

BKIE
7.2%
FEDM
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

BKIE
6.2%
FEDM
7.1%

Energy

BKIE
5.9%
FEDM
5.7%

Communication Services

BKIE
4.2%
FEDM
4.6%

Utilities

BKIE
3.7%
FEDM
3.5%

Real Estate

BKIE
2.0%
FEDM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKIE vs. FEDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FEDM
FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKIE vs. FEDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKIEFEDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

1.41

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

5.07

+2.76

BKIE vs. FEDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the FEDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKIE and FEDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKIEFEDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.04

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.47

+0.46

Drawdowns

BKIE vs. FEDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKIE drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, roughly equal to the maximum FEDM drawdown of -29.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIE and FEDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKIEFEDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.19%

-29.37%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-11.92%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

-14.24%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-1.16%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-6.99%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.30%

-0.35%

Volatility

BKIE vs. FEDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) is 4.31%, while FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that BKIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKIEFEDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

4.71%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.19%

12.47%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

16.14%

-1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

16.46%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

16.46%

-0.13%

BKIE vs. FEDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKIE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FEDM's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKIE vs. FEDM - Dividend Comparison

BKIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than FEDM's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.24%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
2.80%2.97%2.94%2.61%2.53%0.62%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKIE and FEDM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEDM has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to BKIE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIE dropped -28.19% vs FEDM's -29.37%.

On 3-year performance, BKIE leads with 17.90% vs 14.54% for FEDM. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 17.90% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for FEDM.

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.80% for FEDM.

BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index, while FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKIE and 0.12% for FEDM.

BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKIE and FEDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer