BITY vs. FLQL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL).

BITY and FLQL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BITY is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Apr 28, 2025. FLQL is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. It was launched on Apr 26, 2017.

Performance

BITY vs. FLQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BITY vs. FLQL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	-18.54%	-8.21%
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	-2.22%	24.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -18.54% return, which is significantly lower than FLQL's -2.22% return.

BITY

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: 5.36%
• YTD: -18.54%
• 6M: -39.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLQL

• 1D: 3.25%
• 1M: -4.91%
• YTD: -2.22%
• 6M: -0.56%
• 1Y: 21.26%
• 3Y*: 19.32%
• 5Y*: 12.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITY vs. FLQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQL's 0.15% expense ratio.

BITY

Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF

FLQL

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF

Return for Risk

BITY vs. FLQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQL

FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 72
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITY vs. FLQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITY	FLQL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.68	0.77	-1.45

Correlation

The correlation between BITY and FLQL is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BITY vs. FLQL - Dividend Comparison

BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.41%, more than FLQL's 1.16% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	35.41%	21.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	1.16%	1.10%	1.13%	1.50%	2.07%	1.81%	1.99%	1.78%	1.82%	1.22%

Drawdowns

BITY vs. FLQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -46.36%, which is greater than FLQL's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and FLQL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITY	FLQL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.36%	-33.64%	-12.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.26%	-6.09%	-36.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.54%	-4.11%	-12.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BITY	FLQL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.38%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.02%	18.56%	+21.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.02%	16.06%	+23.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.02%	17.57%	+22.45%