BITY vs. FLQL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) and FLQL (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while FLQL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. BITY is actively managed, while FLQL is passively managed. Over the past year, BITY returned -38.86% vs 26.76% for FLQL. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLQL.

Performance

BITY vs. FLQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -26.32% return, which is significantly lower than FLQL's 11.18% return.

BITY

• 1D: -3.55%
• 1M: -17.96%
• YTD: -26.32%
• 6M: -26.36%
• 1Y: -38.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLQL

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 11.18%
• 6M: 9.76%
• 1Y: 26.76%
• 3Y*: 22.29%
• 5Y*: 14.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITY vs. FLQL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	-26.32%	-7.84%
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	11.18%	25.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BITY and FLQL is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

BITY vs. FLQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITY

BITY Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FLQL

FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 67
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITY vs. FLQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITY	FLQL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.95	2.00	-2.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.33	2.79	-4.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.37	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	2.97	-3.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	13.71	-15.07

BITY vs. FLQL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITY Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the FLQL Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITY and FLQL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITY vs. FLQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -50.04%, which is greater than FLQL's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and FLQL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITY	FLQL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.04%	-33.64%	-16.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.04%	-9.05%	-40.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.32%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.77%	-2.01%	-45.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.84%	-4.03%	-16.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.55%	1.96%	+26.59%

Volatility

BITY vs. FLQL - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a higher volatility of 13.74% compared to Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) at 4.83%. This indicates that BITY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITY	FLQL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.74%	4.83%	+8.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.91%	10.94%	+20.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.04%	13.47%	+27.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.52%	16.22%	+23.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.52%	17.52%	+22.00%

BITY vs. FLQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQL's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITY vs. FLQL - Dividend Comparison

BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.39%, more than FLQL's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	41.39%	21.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	1.02%	1.10%	1.13%	1.50%	2.07%	1.81%	1.99%	1.78%	1.82%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITY and FLQL in my portfolio?

BITY and FLQL have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITY or FLQL?

BITY has higher volatility (13.74%) compared to FLQL (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITY dropped -50.04% vs FLQL's -33.64%.

Which ETF is better, BITY or FLQL?

On 1-year performance, FLQL leads with 26.76% vs -38.86% for BITY. On fees, FLQL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLQL has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITY or FLQL?

Over the 1-year period, FLQL has performed better with a 26.76% return vs -38.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITY or FLQL?

FLQL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITY or FLQL?

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 41.39%, compared with 1.02% for FLQL.

What is the main difference between BITY and FLQL?

BITY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FLQL is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITY and 0.15% for FLQL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.