BIMPX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
BIMPX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 20, 2006. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
BIMPX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIMPX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMPX BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund | -2.85% | 13.43% | 4.93% | 12.41% | -14.84% | 3.51% | 19.76% | 16.65% | -3.77% | 11.77% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BIMPX having a -2.85% return and FASGX slightly lower at -2.99%. Over the past 10 years, BIMPX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 5.96%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
BIMPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -2.85%
- 6M
- -1.05%
- 1Y
- 9.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 5.96%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIMPX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIMPX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIMPX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
BIMPX
FASGX
BIMPX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIMPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.73 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.55 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | 6.89 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIMPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.53 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.70 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.60 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIMPX and FASGX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BIMPX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
BIMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMPX BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund | 5.85% | 5.68% | 0.00% | 2.96% | 3.06% | 6.35% | 4.34% | 2.66% | 7.95% | 2.50% | 1.83% | 9.76% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
BIMPX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIMPX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMPX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIMPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.37% | -47.35% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.07% | -9.07% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.85% | -23.54% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.85% | -27.20% | +7.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.74% | -7.95% | +2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -6.74% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 2.04% | -0.58% |
Volatility
BIMPX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) is 3.11%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that BIMPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIMPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 4.57% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.95% | 7.78% | -2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.52% | 12.82% | -4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.08% | 12.14% | -3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.49% | 12.56% | -4.07% |