PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIMPX vs. BAMPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIMPX vs. BAMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A (BAMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BIMPX having a 7.15% return and BAMPX slightly lower at 7.02%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: BIMPX at 6.87% and BAMPX at 6.87%.


BIMPX

1D
0.27%
1M
3.82%
YTD
7.15%
6M
7.40%
1Y
17.31%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
6.87%

BAMPX

1D
0.28%
1M
3.72%
YTD
7.02%
6M
7.22%
1Y
16.90%
3Y*
11.50%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
6.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIMPX vs. BAMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund
7.15%13.43%4.93%12.41%-14.84%3.51%19.76%16.65%-3.77%11.77%
BAMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A
7.02%13.05%8.15%11.99%-15.08%3.39%19.09%16.23%-4.07%11.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BIMPX and BAMPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2006

0.99

The correlation between BIMPX and BAMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIMPX vs. BAMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIMPX
BIMPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BIMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BAMPX
BAMPX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BAMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIMPX vs. BAMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A (BAMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIMPXBAMPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.49

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.97

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.47

13.07

+0.40

BIMPX vs. BAMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIMPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the BAMPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMPX and BAMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIMPXBAMPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.47

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.57

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.81

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.58

+0.01

Drawdowns

BIMPX vs. BAMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMPX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, roughly equal to the maximum BAMPX drawdown of -39.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMPX and BAMPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIMPXBAMPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.37%

-39.58%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.74%

-5.81%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.11%

-8.29%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.85%

-20.13%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.85%

-20.13%

+0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-4.87%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

1.31%

-0.01%

Volatility

BIMPX vs. BAMPX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A (BAMPX) have volatilities of 2.70% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIMPXBAMPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

2.62%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.94%

5.95%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.99%

6.98%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.19%

9.08%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

8.47%

+0.10%

BIMPX vs. BAMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIMPX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMPX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIMPX vs. BAMPX - Dividend Comparison

BIMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than BAMPX's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Inv A
5.05%5.40%3.11%2.67%2.72%6.11%4.12%2.36%7.62%2.17%1.57%9.54%
BIMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund
5.30%5.68%0.00%2.96%3.06%6.35%4.34%2.66%7.95%2.50%1.83%9.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, BIMPX and BAMPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BIMPX has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to BAMPX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIMPX dropped -39.37% vs BAMPX's -39.58%.

BIMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIMPX and BAMPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer