BIMPX vs. AOK
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK).
BIMPX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 20, 2006. AOK is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Conservative Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Performance
BIMPX vs. AOK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIMPX vs. AOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMPX BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund | -1.31% | 13.43% | 4.93% | 12.41% | -14.84% | 3.51% | 19.76% | 16.65% | -3.77% | 11.77% |
AOK iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF | 0.12% | 11.26% | 6.58% | 10.85% | -14.16% | 4.87% | 9.33% | 13.90% | -3.09% | 9.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIMPX achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly lower than AOK's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMPX has outperformed AOK with an annualized return of 6.13%, while AOK has yielded a comparatively lower 4.88% annualized return.
BIMPX
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 11.33%
- 3Y*
- 8.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- 6.13%
AOK
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 4.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIMPX vs. AOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIMPX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than AOK's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BIMPX vs. AOK — Risk / Return Rank
BIMPX
AOK
BIMPX vs. AOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIMPX | AOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 1.97 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 2.22 | -0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 8.55 | -0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIMPX | AOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.48 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.73 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.69 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIMPX and AOK is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BIMPX vs. AOK - Dividend Comparison
BIMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than AOK's 3.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMPX BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund | 5.76% | 5.68% | 0.00% | 2.96% | 3.06% | 6.35% | 4.34% | 2.66% | 7.95% | 2.50% | 1.83% | 9.76% |
AOK iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.34% | 3.28% | 3.23% | 2.93% | 2.25% | 1.55% | 2.10% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 2.91% | 2.14% | 2.02% |
Drawdowns
BIMPX vs. AOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIMPX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, which is greater than AOK's maximum drawdown of -18.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMPX and AOK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIMPX | AOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.37% | -18.94% | -20.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.07% | -4.50% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.85% | -18.94% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.85% | -18.94% | -0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -2.89% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -2.38% | -2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | 1.17% | +0.31% |
Volatility
BIMPX vs. AOK - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) at 2.87%. This indicates that BIMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIMPX | AOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 2.87% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.19% | 4.25% | +0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.64% | 6.80% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.11% | 7.05% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.50% | 6.68% | +1.82% |