PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILL vs. NU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BILL vs. NU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILL achieves a -39.16% return, which is significantly lower than NU's -27.18% return.


BILL

1D
3.27%
1M
-16.97%
YTD
-39.16%
6M
-39.18%
1Y
-24.54%
3Y*
-34.51%
5Y*
-26.75%
10Y*

NU

1D
0.83%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
-27.18%
6M
-27.87%
1Y
1.58%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILL vs. NU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BILL
Bill.com Holdings, Inc.
-39.16%-35.62%3.82%-25.12%-56.27%-5.79%
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
-27.18%61.58%24.37%104.67%-56.61%-16.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BILL and NU is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021

0.42

The correlation between BILL and NU shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BILL:

$3.39B

NU:

$59.86B

EPS

BILL:

$0.00

NU:

$0.65

PE Ratio

BILL:

20.80K

NU:

18.78

PS Ratio

BILL:

2.12

NU:

3.41

PB Ratio

BILL:

0.89

NU:

4.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

BILL:

$1.60B

NU:

$17.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BILL:

$1.29B

NU:

$7.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

BILL:

$68.77M

NU:

$4.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILL vs. NU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILL
BILL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILL Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILL Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

NU
NU Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NU Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NU Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILL vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILLNUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.04

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

0.04

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

0.10

-1.35

BILL vs. NU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILL Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the NU Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILL and NU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BILL vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILL drawdown since its inception was -90.61%, which is greater than NU's maximum drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILL and NU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILLNUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.61%

-72.07%

-18.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.94%

-38.17%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.29%

-39.58%

-36.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.31%

-35.02%

-55.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.69%

-29.77%

-24.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.67%

15.36%

+4.31%

Volatility

BILL vs. NU - Volatility Comparison

Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) has a higher volatility of 16.82% compared to Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) at 14.80%. This indicates that BILL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILLNUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.82%

14.80%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.00%

28.91%

+21.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.38%

38.77%

+24.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.45%

58.48%

+11.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.98%

58.48%

+14.50%

Dividends

BILL vs. NU - Dividend Comparison

Neither BILL nor NU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BILL vs. NU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bill.com Holdings, Inc. and Nu Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
406.56M
4.98B
(BILL) Total Revenue
(NU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BILL vs. NU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bill.com Holdings, Inc. and Nu Holdings Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
81.6%
40.2%
Portfolio components
BILL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bill.com Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.85M and revenue of 406.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.6%.

NU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 4.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

BILL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bill.com Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 96.41M and revenue of 406.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.

NU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.31M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.

BILL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bill.com Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 12.79M and revenue of 406.56M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

NU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 872.06M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BILL and NU have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BILL has higher volatility (16.82%) compared to NU (14.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILL dropped -90.61% vs NU's -72.07%.

NU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILL and NU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer