BGT vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
BGT is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 26, 2004. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
BGT vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGT vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | -1.91% | -0.84% | 16.12% | 26.29% | -16.57% | 25.89% | -0.81% | 18.97% | -11.95% | 3.91% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGT achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BGT has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 6.51%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
BGT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- -1.91%
- 6M
- -5.80%
- 1Y
- -2.05%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.51%
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGT vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGT has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGT vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
BGT
FASGX
BGT vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGT | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | 1.41 | -1.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | 2.01 | -2.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.30 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 2.00 | -2.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 8.74 | -9.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGT | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | 1.41 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.55 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.71 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.60 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGT and FASGX is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BGT vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.41%, more than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 13.41% | 12.74% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.03% | 6.04% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
BGT vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGT | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -47.35% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -9.07% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.19% | -23.54% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.90% | -27.20% | -14.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.89% | -5.77% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -6.74% | -1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 2.07% | +2.64% |
Volatility
BGT vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) is 4.64%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that BGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGT | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 5.30% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.44% | 8.12% | -0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.04% | 13.00% | +2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 12.18% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 12.58% | +2.73% |