BGT vs. MPV
BGT (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust) is Bank Loan fund managed by BlackRock, while MPV (Barings Participation Investors) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BGT returned 6.41%/yr vs 9.59%/yr for MPV. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BGT vs. MPV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGT achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than MPV's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, BGT has underperformed MPV with an annualized return of 6.41%, while MPV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return.
BGT
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- -1.61%
- 3Y*
- 10.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.41%
MPV
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- -3.38%
- 1Y
- -3.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.03%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
BGT vs. MPV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 0.26% | -0.84% | 16.12% | 26.29% | -16.57% | 25.89% | -0.81% | 18.97% | -11.95% | 3.91% |
MPV Barings Participation Investors | 10.71% | 0.74% | 20.52% | 39.14% | -10.73% | 31.93% | -21.01% | 14.57% | 14.84% | 7.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGT and MPV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2004 | 0.09 |
The correlation between BGT and MPV shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGT vs. MPV — Risk / Return Rank
BGT
MPV
BGT vs. MPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and Barings Participation Investors (MPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGT | MPV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.00 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | -0.15 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | -0.39 | +0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGT vs. MPV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than MPV's maximum drawdown of -54.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and MPV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGT | MPV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -54.02% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -19.76% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.91% | -19.76% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.19% | -22.63% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.90% | -54.02% | +12.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -11.17% | +5.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -7.75% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 7.72% | -2.58% |
Volatility
BGT vs. MPV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) is 1.46%, while Barings Participation Investors (MPV) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that BGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGT | MPV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 6.02% | -4.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.02% | 19.56% | -12.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.95% | 25.18% | -15.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 21.18% | -7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 25.85% | -10.51% |
Dividends
BGT vs. MPV - Dividend Comparison
BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.57%, more than MPV's 8.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 13.57% | 12.74% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.03% | 6.04% |
MPV Barings Participation Investors | 8.59% | 9.31% | 9.19% | 8.27% | 6.98% | 5.41% | 6.73% | 6.70% | 7.18% | 7.66% | 7.61% | 7.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGT and MPV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MPV has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to BGT (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGT dropped -58.06% vs MPV's -54.02%.
MPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGT and MPV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer