BGT vs. EFT
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT).
BGT is managed by Blackrock. It was launched on Aug 26, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BGT or EFT.
Correlation
The correlation between BGT and EFT is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BGT vs. EFT - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
BGT:
0.15
EFT:
-0.00
BGT:
0.33
EFT:
0.01
BGT:
1.05
EFT:
1.00
BGT:
0.18
EFT:
-0.05
BGT:
0.61
EFT:
-0.21
BGT:
4.58%
EFT:
4.25%
BGT:
16.70%
EFT:
14.21%
BGT:
-58.31%
EFT:
-60.58%
BGT:
-4.97%
EFT:
-8.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGT achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly higher than EFT's -2.83% return. Over the past 10 years, BGT has outperformed EFT with an annualized return of 6.64%, while EFT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.79% annualized return.
BGT
-0.97%
5.41%
-0.69%
2.48%
12.76%
6.64%
EFT
-2.83%
5.03%
-3.92%
-0.02%
11.43%
5.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BGT vs. EFT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BGT
EFT
BGT vs. EFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
BGT vs. EFT - Dividend Comparison
BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.78%, more than EFT's 10.48% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 11.78% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.44% | 6.04% | 6.65% |
EFT Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | 10.48% | 10.52% | 11.09% | 9.14% | 5.26% | 5.40% | 7.41% | 6.77% | 5.26% | 5.54% | 7.17% | 5.82% |
Drawdowns
BGT vs. EFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, roughly equal to the maximum EFT drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and EFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
BGT vs. EFT - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) at 3.33%. This indicates that BGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...