BGT vs. EFT
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT).
BGT is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 26, 2004.
Performance
BGT vs. EFT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGT vs. EFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | -1.91% | -0.84% | 16.12% | 26.29% | -16.57% | 25.89% | -0.81% | 18.97% | -11.95% | 3.91% |
EFT Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | -3.58% | -3.77% | 13.17% | 27.14% | -19.69% | 21.00% | 2.41% | 16.85% | -6.14% | 1.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGT achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly higher than EFT's -3.58% return. Over the past 10 years, BGT has outperformed EFT with an annualized return of 6.51%, while EFT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.85% annualized return.
BGT
- 1D
- 3.36%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- -1.91%
- 6M
- -5.65%
- 1Y
- -2.13%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.51%
EFT
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- -3.58%
- 6M
- -4.73%
- 1Y
- -6.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGT vs. EFT — Risk / Return Rank
BGT
EFT
BGT vs. EFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGT | EFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | -0.47 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | -0.55 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.91 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | -0.49 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | -1.11 | +0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGT | EFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | -0.47 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.29 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.37 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.26 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGT and EFT is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BGT vs. EFT - Dividend Comparison
BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.41%, more than EFT's 9.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 13.41% | 12.74% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.03% | 6.04% |
EFT Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | 9.78% | 9.55% | 10.52% | 11.09% | 9.81% | 5.24% | 5.88% | 7.41% | 6.77% | 5.73% | 5.54% | 6.57% |
Drawdowns
BGT vs. EFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, roughly equal to the maximum EFT drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and EFT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGT | EFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -60.58% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -13.02% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.19% | -24.98% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.90% | -45.51% | +3.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.89% | -12.15% | +4.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -8.80% | +0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 5.72% | -1.03% |
Volatility
BGT vs. EFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) is 4.68%, while Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that BGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGT | EFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | 5.25% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.45% | 6.92% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.04% | 13.95% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 12.67% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 15.74% | -0.43% |