BGT vs. ECAT

In the year-to-date period, BGT achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than ECAT's 3.53% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BGT has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ECAT's 1.38% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BGT Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the ECAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGT and ECAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.93%, less than ECAT's 22.14% yield.

The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and ECAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.