BGT vs. ECAT
BGT (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust) and ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) are both mutual funds - BGT is a Bank Loan fund managed by BlackRock, while ECAT is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 3 years, BGT returned 8.77%/yr vs 17.59%/yr for ECAT. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BGT charges 1.74%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for ECAT.
Performance
BGT vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGT achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than ECAT's 10.45% return.
BGT
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 1Y
- -3.09%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 6.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.40%
ECAT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 14.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.59M | $1.30M | $1.18M | |
| $7.46M | $7.38M | $7.72M |
BGT vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 3.20% | -0.84% | 16.12% | 26.29% | -16.57% | 8.30% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 10.45% | 16.64% | 19.96% | 32.36% | -21.90% | -6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGT and ECAT is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGT vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank
BGT
ECAT
BGT vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGT | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.17 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 1.16 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 4.22 | -4.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGT vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and ECAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGT | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -32.23% | -25.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -11.80% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.91% | -15.79% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -4.28% | +1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -8.86% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 3.24% | +2.17% |
Volatility
BGT vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) is 3.08%, while BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that BGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGT | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 3.75% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.43% | 11.27% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.95% | 14.17% | -4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 16.82% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 16.82% | -1.47% |
BGT vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGT has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ECAT's 1.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGT vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison
BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.33%, less than ECAT's 22.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 13.33% | 12.74% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.03% | 6.04% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 22.31% | 23.00% | 17.44% | 9.14% | 8.94% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGT and ECAT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECAT has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to BGT (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGT dropped -58.06% vs ECAT's -32.23%.
ECAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGT and ECAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer