BGT vs. ECAT
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT).
BGT is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 26, 2004. ECAT is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 28, 2021.
Performance
BGT vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGT vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | -1.91% | -0.84% | 16.12% | 26.29% | -16.57% | 7.08% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | -6.71% | 16.64% | 19.96% | 32.36% | -21.90% | -6.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGT achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly higher than ECAT's -6.71% return.
BGT
- 1D
- 3.36%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- -1.91%
- 6M
- -5.65%
- 1Y
- -2.13%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.51%
ECAT
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- YTD
- -6.71%
- 6M
- -7.80%
- 1Y
- 7.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGT vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGT has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ECAT's 1.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGT vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank
BGT
ECAT
BGT vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGT | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | 0.42 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | 0.68 | -0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.09 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 0.47 | -0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 1.75 | -2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGT | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | 0.42 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.32 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGT and ECAT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BGT vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison
BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.41%, less than ECAT's 25.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 13.41% | 12.74% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.03% | 6.04% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 25.39% | 23.00% | 17.44% | 9.14% | 8.94% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BGT vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and ECAT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGT | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -32.23% | -25.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -12.90% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.89% | -10.48% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -9.41% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 3.49% | +1.20% |
Volatility
BGT vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) is 4.68%, while BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that BGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGT | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | 5.97% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.45% | 10.34% | -2.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.04% | 16.97% | -1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 16.95% | -3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 16.95% | -1.64% |