BGLTX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
BGLTX is managed by Baillie Gifford Funds. It was launched on Jun 9, 2014. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
BGLTX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGLTX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund | -19.19% | 16.38% | 25.03% | 36.61% | -46.09% | 2.47% | 102.05% | 33.53% | -1.37% | 54.04% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGLTX achieves a -19.19% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, BGLTX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 13.92%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
BGLTX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- -19.19%
- 6M
- -24.34%
- 1Y
- -0.32%
- 3Y*
- 10.54%
- 5Y*
- -1.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGLTX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGLTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGLTX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
BGLTX
FGIAX
BGLTX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGLTX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | 1.75 | -1.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.08 | 2.26 | -2.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.35 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 2.61 | -2.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 12.12 | -12.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGLTX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 | 1.75 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.80 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.58 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.42 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGLTX and FGIAX is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BGLTX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
BGLTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.84% | 5.15% | 8.39% | 0.15% | 10.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
BGLTX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGLTX drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLTX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGLTX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.17% | -49.35% | -20.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.64% | -8.29% | -17.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.17% | -21.08% | -49.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.17% | -38.02% | -32.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.64% | -3.78% | -21.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.00% | -7.22% | -8.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.60% | 1.78% | +6.82% |
Volatility
BGLTX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that BGLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGLTX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 4.05% | +3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.31% | 7.09% | +9.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.19% | 12.28% | +12.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.82% | 13.08% | +54.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.00% | 15.17% | +35.83% |