PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGLTX vs. BGETX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGLTX vs. BGETX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and Baillie Gifford International Growth Fund (BGETX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGLTX achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than BGETX's 4.44% return. Over the past 10 years, BGLTX has outperformed BGETX with an annualized return of 14.94%, while BGETX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.73% annualized return.


BGLTX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
-11.38%
6M
-12.36%
1Y
-6.19%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
-0.95%
10Y*
14.94%

BGETX

1D
0.34%
1M
2.68%
YTD
4.44%
6M
4.51%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
-2.10%
10Y*
8.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGLTX vs. BGETX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGLTX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund
-11.38%16.38%25.03%36.61%-46.09%2.47%102.05%33.53%-1.37%54.04%
BGETX
Baillie Gifford International Growth Fund
4.44%17.30%7.78%14.22%-34.40%-9.47%63.22%37.37%-17.30%43.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BGLTX and BGETX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.85

The correlation between BGLTX and BGETX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGLTX vs. BGETX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLTX
BGLTX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BGLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BGETX
BGETX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BGETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGETX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BGETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGETX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGLTX vs. BGETX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and Baillie Gifford International Growth Fund (BGETX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGLTXBGETXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.10

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

0.61

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

1.77

-2.30

BGLTX vs. BGETX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGLTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the BGETX Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGLTX and BGETX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGLTXBGETXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

0.48

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.08

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.37

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.36

-0.08

Drawdowns

BGLTX vs. BGETX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGLTX drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, which is greater than BGETX's maximum drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLTX and BGETX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGLTXBGETXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.17%

-54.44%

-15.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.64%

-15.69%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.28%

-22.59%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.17%

-51.52%

-18.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.17%

-54.44%

-15.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.45%

-20.39%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.03%

-18.97%

+2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.19%

5.41%

+5.78%

Volatility

BGLTX vs. BGETX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) is 3.65%, while Baillie Gifford International Growth Fund (BGETX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that BGLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGETX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGLTXBGETXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

4.89%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.67%

15.94%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.51%

19.90%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.82%

25.97%

+41.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.05%

23.99%

+27.06%

BGLTX vs. BGETX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than BGETX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGLTX vs. BGETX - Dividend Comparison

BGLTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGETX
Baillie Gifford International Growth Fund
5.19%5.42%7.29%0.39%0.62%16.03%10.22%1.12%10.73%0.40%
BGLTX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.84%5.15%8.39%0.15%10.07%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGLTX and BGETX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGETX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to BGLTX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGLTX dropped -70.17% vs BGETX's -54.44%.

BGETX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGLTX and BGETX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer