PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BGLTX vs. MOAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BGLTX and MOAT is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

BGLTX vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
24.37%
0.23%
BGLTX
MOAT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BGLTX:

1.64

MOAT:

0.81

Sortino Ratio

BGLTX:

2.31

MOAT:

1.17

Omega Ratio

BGLTX:

1.30

MOAT:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

BGLTX:

0.87

MOAT:

1.42

Martin Ratio

BGLTX:

9.09

MOAT:

3.34

Ulcer Index

BGLTX:

3.92%

MOAT:

2.81%

Daily Std Dev

BGLTX:

21.81%

MOAT:

11.52%

Max Drawdown

BGLTX:

-58.69%

MOAT:

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

BGLTX:

-16.30%

MOAT:

-5.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGLTX achieves a 14.46% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.64% return.


BGLTX

YTD

14.46%

1M

10.29%

6M

25.70%

1Y

34.44%

5Y*

10.00%

10Y*

N/A

MOAT

YTD

-0.64%

1M

-2.10%

6M

0.94%

1Y

8.68%

5Y*

11.66%

10Y*

13.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BGLTX vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.


BGLTX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for BGLTX: current value at 0.73% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.73%
Expense ratio chart for MOAT: current value at 0.48% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.48%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BGLTX vs. MOAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLTX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BGLTX is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BGLTX is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BGLTX is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BGLTX is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BGLTX is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BGLTX is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MOAT is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MOAT is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MOAT is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MOAT is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MOAT is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MOAT is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BGLTX vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BGLTX, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.640.81
The chart of Sortino ratio for BGLTX, currently valued at 2.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.311.17
The chart of Omega ratio for BGLTX, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.301.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for BGLTX, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.871.42
The chart of Martin ratio for BGLTX, currently valued at 9.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.009.093.34
BGLTX
MOAT

The current BGLTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGLTX and MOAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.64
0.81
BGLTX
MOAT

Dividends

BGLTX vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

BGLTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BGLTX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.38%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.45%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%1.34%

Drawdowns

BGLTX vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGLTX drawdown since its inception was -58.69%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLTX and MOAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-16.30%
-5.41%
BGLTX
MOAT

Volatility

BGLTX vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 3.07%. This indicates that BGLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.77%
3.07%
BGLTX
MOAT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab