BGLTX vs. IVV
Compare and contrast key facts about Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
BGLTX is managed by Baillie Gifford Funds. It was launched on Jun 9, 2014. IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000.
Performance
BGLTX vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGLTX vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund | -19.19% | 16.38% | 25.03% | 36.61% | -46.09% | 2.47% | 102.05% | 33.53% | -1.37% | 54.04% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | -4.38% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGLTX achieves a -19.19% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's -4.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BGLTX having a 13.92% annualized return and IVV not far ahead at 14.02%.
BGLTX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- -19.19%
- 6M
- -24.34%
- 1Y
- -0.32%
- 3Y*
- 10.54%
- 5Y*
- -1.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
IVV
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- -4.38%
- 6M
- -1.80%
- 1Y
- 17.69%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGLTX vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGLTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGLTX vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
BGLTX
IVV
BGLTX vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGLTX | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | 0.97 | -1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.08 | 1.49 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.23 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 1.53 | -1.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 7.32 | -7.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGLTX | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 | 0.97 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.70 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.78 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.42 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGLTX and IVV is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BGLTX vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
BGLTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.84% | 5.15% | 8.39% | 0.15% | 10.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.23% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Drawdowns
BGLTX vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGLTX drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLTX and IVV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGLTX | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.17% | -55.25% | -14.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.64% | -12.06% | -13.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.17% | -24.53% | -45.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.17% | -33.90% | -36.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.64% | -6.26% | -19.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.00% | -10.85% | -5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.60% | 2.53% | +6.07% |
Volatility
BGLTX vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 5.30%. This indicates that BGLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGLTX | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 5.30% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.31% | 9.45% | +6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.19% | 18.31% | +6.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.82% | 16.89% | +50.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.00% | 18.04% | +32.96% |