BGC vs. ES

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and Eversource Energy (ES).

Performance

BGC vs. ES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and Eversource Energy (ES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BGC vs. ES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGC BGC Group Inc.	9.75%	-0.58%	26.46%	92.20%	-18.92%	16.25%	-32.66%	14.89%	-65.78%	47.70%
ES Eversource Energy	3.98%	22.86%	-2.46%	-23.43%	-5.06%	8.18%	4.45%	34.49%	6.41%	17.97%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BGC : $4.65B ES : $26.06B
EPS BGC : $0.32 ES : $4.54
PE Ratio BGC : 30.39 ES : 15.25
PEG Ratio BGC : 0.80 ES : 0.86
PS Ratio BGC : 1.59 ES : 1.90
PB Ratio BGC : 4.78 ES : 0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) BGC : $2.97B ES : $13.55B
Gross Profit (TTM) BGC : $1.64B ES : $6.48B
EBITDA (TTM) BGC : $442.08M ES : $5.38B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGC achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly higher than ES's 3.98% return. Over the past 10 years, BGC has underperformed ES with an annualized return of 0.99%, while ES has yielded a comparatively higher 5.22% annualized return.

BGC

• 1D: 2.52%
• 1M: 2.94%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 3.84%
• 1Y: 7.58%
• 3Y*: 24.11%
• 5Y*: 14.68%
• 10Y*: 0.99%

ES

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -8.13%
• YTD: 3.98%
• 6M: -0.48%
• 1Y: 16.71%
• 3Y*: 0.43%
• 5Y*: -0.54%
• 10Y*: 5.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BGC vs. ES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGC

BGC Risk / Return Rank: 47
BGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
BGC Omega Ratio Rank: 43
BGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BGC Martin Ratio Rank: 48

ES

ES Risk / Return Rank: 63
ES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ES Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ES Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ES Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ES Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGC vs. ES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BGC Group Inc. (BGC) and Eversource Energy (ES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGC	ES	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	0.63	-0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.58	0.94	-0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.14	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.32	1.23	-0.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.61	3.33	-2.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGC vs. ES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the ES Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGC and ES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGC	ES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	0.63	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	-0.02	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02	0.22	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.28	-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between BGC and ES is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BGC vs. ES - Dividend Comparison

BGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than ES's 4.40% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGC BGC Group Inc.	0.82%	0.90%	0.77%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ES Eversource Energy	4.40%	4.47%	4.98%	4.37%	3.04%	2.65%	2.62%	2.52%	3.11%	3.01%	3.22%	3.27%

Drawdowns

BGC vs. ES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGC drawdown since its inception was -98.31%, which is greater than ES's maximum drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGC and ES.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGC	ES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.31%	-73.04%	-25.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.25%	-15.13%	-8.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.80%	-41.69%	-10.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.93%	-41.69%	-45.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.94%	-13.60%	-74.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.09%	-19.09%	-69.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.26%	5.59%	+6.67%

Volatility

BGC vs. ES - Volatility Comparison

BGC Group Inc. (BGC) has a higher volatility of 8.64% compared to Eversource Energy (ES) at 7.20%. This indicates that BGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGC	ES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.64%	7.20%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.10%	19.74%	+1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.03%	26.49%	+6.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.60%	23.77%	+14.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.90%	24.24%	+17.66%

Financials

BGC vs. ES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BGC Group Inc. and Eversource Energy over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BGC Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 738.52M and revenue of 823.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.7%.

ES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eversource Energy reported a gross profit of 985.40M and revenue of 3.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.2%.

BGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BGC Group Inc. reported an operating income of 42.77M and revenue of 823.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.

ES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eversource Energy reported an operating income of 710.46M and revenue of 3.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

BGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BGC Group Inc. reported a net income of 14.37M and revenue of 823.09M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.

ES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eversource Energy reported a net income of 421.31M and revenue of 3.37B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.